Bourbaki

Remark 4

Tag 01MN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01MN].

Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 2. Applications étales

Let f:X→Yf: X\rightarrow Y be a continuous and separated mapping, yy a point

of Y and A a finite subset of f−1(y)\overset{-1}{f}(y). Let us show that there exists a family (Va)a∈A(V_a)_{a\in A} of pairwise disjoint sets such that for each a∈Aa\in A, the set VaV_a is a neighbourhood of aa in X. For this, for each subset {a,b}\{a, b\} of A with two elements, let us choose a neighbourhood V(a,b)V_{(a,b)} of aa and a neighbourhood V(b,a)V_{(b,a)} of bb in X such that V(a,b)∩V(b,a)=∅V_{(a,b)}\cap V_{(b,a)}=\emptyset (prop. 1, (iii)). Let VaV_a denote the intersection of the family consisting of X and the sets V(a,b)V_{(a,b)} for b∈A,b=a̸b\in A,b=\not a. The set VaV_a is a neighbourhood of aa in X, and if a,ba,b are two distinct elements of A, the set Va∩VbV_a\cap V_b is contained in V(a,b)∩V(b,a)V_{(a,b)}\cap V_{(b,a)}, hence is empty.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.