Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 01MQ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01MQ].

Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 2. Applications étales

Let

X′f′{X'}^{f'} X

p′pp'p

B′f{B'}^f B

be a cartesian square. If the mapping pp is separated, the same is true of p′p'. Conversely, if p′p' is separated and if ff is universally strict and surjective, then pp is separated.

Consider the square

X′×B′X′φX×BX X'\times_{B'}{X'}^{\varphi}X\times_BX
q′qq'q

B′f{B'}^f B

where the mapping φ\varphi is induced by the mapping f′×f′:X′×X′→X×Xf'\times f': X'\times X'\rightarrow X\times X. Recall (I, p. 13, example 1) that this square is cartesian and that one has φ−1(ΔX)=ΔX′\overset{-1}{\varphi}(\Delta_X) = \Delta_{X'}.

If the mapping pp is separated, the set ΔX\Delta_X is closed in X×BXX\times_BX; consequently, ΔX′\Delta_{X'} is a closed subset of X′×B′X′X'\times_{B'}X', which proves that the mapping p′p' is separated.

If the mapping ff is surjective, the mapping φ\varphi is surjective (I, p. 10, cor.) ; if ff is universally strict, φ\varphi is strict (I, p. 20, def. 6). Suppose the mapping p′p' separated. Then ΔX′\Delta_{X'} is closed in X′×B′X′X'\times_{B'}X'. Since ΔX′=φ−1(ΔX)\Delta_{X'}=\overset{-1}{\varphi}(\Delta_X) and since φ\varphi is surjective and strict, ΔX\Delta_X is closed in X×BXX\times_BX, which proves that the mapping pp is separated.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.