Lemma 1
Tag 01NL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01NL].
Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 2. Applications étales
Each of properties (i) to (iv) of theorem 2 implies property (PCV).
Let be an open covering of A by open sets of B. Under hypothesis (i), there exists a paracompact neighbourhood V of A contained in the union of the , an open covering of the space V, locally finite and finer than the covering , and an open covering of the space V such that for every , the closure of in V is contained in (TG, IX, p. 49, prop. 4 and p. 48, cor. 1 to th. 3). Hence property (PCV) in this case.
Condition (ii) implies condition (i) by Corollary 2 of TG, IX, p. 50. Analogously, condition (iii) implies condition (i): in fact, if B is metrisable, every neighbourhood of A is metrisable, hence paracompact (TG, IX, p. 51, th. 4).
Lastly, suppose that condition (iv) is satisfied, and let us show that property (PCV) holds. Since A is compact, it is enough to consider the case of a finite covering . We then construct by induction open sets of B satisfying the following conditions for
Suppose that have been constructed satisfying the above conditions for , and let us construct . The sets K = and are closed in A, hence compact. By virtue of , they are disjoint. By hypothesis, for every point of L and every point of K, there exist disjoint neighbourhoods of and in B. By Lemma 2 below, there exist disjoint open sets and W in B such that and . From the inclusions and and from the definition of L, it follows that holds for . On the other hand, we have , hence .
The set is closed and does not meet A by . By , the set M is a neighbourhood of A in B. For , put this is a closed subset of V, contained in . The family is a covering of V, whence property (PCV).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.