Bourbaki

Lemma

Tag 01PN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01PN].

Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 4. Revêtements

If U is a connected component of E′E', the restriction of ff to U induces a homeomorphism of U onto a connected component of E.

Let x∈F′x\in F' be such that U=B×{x}(U = B\times \{x\}(cf. I, p. 79). The mapping from B into E which to b∈Bb\in B assigns f(b,x)f(b, x) is a continuous section of pp. Its image X is therefore connected and open in E, since pp is etale (I, p. 30, Corollary 3). It is moreover closed under assumption a), since pp is separated (I, p. 27, Proposition 3). It is also closed under assumption b) by Corollary 1 of I, p. 80, since U is open and closed in E′E'. Consequently, X is a connected component of E.

Since f∣U:U→Xf|U: U\rightarrow X is bijective and open, it is a homeomorphism onto its image, which proves the lemma.

Let us retain the assumptions preceding the lemma and now prove assertion a). Let V be a connected component of E. It is a

set open and closed in E and f−1(V)\overset{-1}{f}(V) is a union of connected components of E′E' which ff maps homeomorphically onto V by the lemma. It follows from Proposition 6 of I, p. 79 that (E′,f)(E', f) is a covering.

Let us prove b). Since ff is surjective, it follows from the lemma that every connected component V of E is the homeomorphic image of a connected component U=B×{x}U = B\times \{x\} of E′E'. The mapping pp then induces a homeomorphism of V onto B. By Proposition 6, E is a covering of B.

This therefore proves the proposition, under the additional assumption that B is connected and E′E' a trivializable covering of B. Let us prove it in the general case.

There exists a covering (Ui)i∈I(U_i)_{i\in I} of B, consisting of connected open sets over which the covering E′E' is trivializable. Let i∈Ii\in I.

Let us prove a). If the mapping pp is etale and separated, the same is true of the mapping pUi:Ui×BE→Uip_{U_i}: U_i\times_BE\rightarrow U_i, for i∈Ii\in I, by Propositions 8 of I, p. 31 and 4 of I, p. 27. It therefore follows from the particular case treated that,

for every i∈Ii\in I, the UiU_i-space ((−p′1)(Ui),fUi(^-{p'}^1)(U_i), f_{U_i}) is a covering. Let A denote the sum space of the UiU_i and q:A→Bq: A\rightarrow B the canonical mapping. Then the space A×BE′A\times_BE', endowed with the mapping fA:A×BE′→A×BEf_A: A\times_BE'\rightarrow A\times_BE is a covering of A×BEA\times_BE. The mapping qq admits a continuous section in a neighbourhood of every point of B and Proposition 3 of I, p. 72, applied to the cartesian square

A×BE′E′ A\times_BE'E'
fAf _{f_A}f

A×BEA\times_BE E

implies that E′E' is a covering of E.

Let us prove b). Suppose that ff is surjective. Then, for every element ii of I, the mapping fUi:Ui×BE′→Ui×BEf_{U_i}: U_i\times_BE'\rightarrow U_i\times_BE is surjective and the space Ui×BE′U_i\times_BE', endowed with the mapping fUif_{U_i}, is a covering of Ui×BEU_i\times_BE (I, p. 71, Corollary 2 of Proposition 2). It follows from the particular case treated above that the UiU_i-space (p−1(Ui),pUi)(\overset{-1}{p}(U_i), p_{U_i}) is a covering. Consequently, E is a covering of B.

Let B be a topological space, let E and E′E' be coverings of B, and let f:E→E′f: E\rightarrow E' be a B-morphism We have seen that (E,f)(E, f) is a covering under each of the two following assumptions: 1) the covering E is locally of finite degree (I, p. 76, Corollary 1) ; 2) the space B is locally connected (I, p. 81, Proposition 7). This phenomenon may be explained as follows.

Let F and F′F' be discrete topological spaces and let f:B×F→f: B\times F\rightarrow B×F′B\times F' be a B-morphism. The mapping f~:a↦\widetilde{f}:a\mapsto pr2∘f(b,⋅)_2\circ f(b,\cdot ) of B into the space Cc(F;F′)\mathscr{C}_c(F; F') is continuous (TG, X, p. 28, th. 3). If U is an open set of B such that the mapping f~\widetilde{f} is constant on U, the mapping fU:U×f_U: U\times F→U×F′F\rightarrow U\times F' deduced from ff is a trivializable covering (I, p. 69, prop. 1).

The space Cc(F;F′)\mathscr{C}_c(F; F') is none other than the set F(F;F′)\mathscr{F}(F; F') of mappings of F into F′F' endowed with the topology deduced from the topology of the product space (F′)F(F')^F by the canonical identification. For this topology, the space F(F;F′)\mathscr{F}(F; F') is totally disconnected (I, p. 84, prop. 10). Consequently, if the space B is connected, the mapping f~\widetilde{f} is constant (I, p. 82, prop. 4); if the space B is locally connected, the mapping f~\widetilde{f} is locally constant. When the set F is finite, the space F(F;F′)\mathscr{F}(F; F') is discrete and the mapping f~\widetilde{f} is locally constant.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.