Lemma
Tag 01PN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01PN].
Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 4. Revêtements
If U is a connected component of , the restriction of to U induces a homeomorphism of U onto a connected component of E.
Let be such that cf. I, p. 79). The mapping from B into E which to assigns is a continuous section of . Its image X is therefore connected and open in E, since is etale (I, p. 30, Corollary 3). It is moreover closed under assumption a), since is separated (I, p. 27, Proposition 3). It is also closed under assumption b) by Corollary 1 of I, p. 80, since U is open and closed in . Consequently, X is a connected component of E.
Since is bijective and open, it is a homeomorphism onto its image, which proves the lemma.
Let us retain the assumptions preceding the lemma and now prove assertion a). Let V be a connected component of E. It is a
set open and closed in E and is a union of connected components of which maps homeomorphically onto V by the lemma. It follows from Proposition 6 of I, p. 79 that is a covering.
Let us prove b). Since is surjective, it follows from the lemma that every connected component V of E is the homeomorphic image of a connected component of . The mapping then induces a homeomorphism of V onto B. By Proposition 6, E is a covering of B.
This therefore proves the proposition, under the additional assumption that B is connected and a trivializable covering of B. Let us prove it in the general case.
There exists a covering of B, consisting of connected open sets over which the covering is trivializable. Let .
Let us prove a). If the mapping is etale and separated, the same is true of the mapping , for , by Propositions 8 of I, p. 31 and 4 of I, p. 27. It therefore follows from the particular case treated that,
for every , the -space () is a covering. Let A denote the sum space of the and the canonical mapping. Then the space , endowed with the mapping is a covering of . The mapping admits a continuous section in a neighbourhood of every point of B and Proposition 3 of I, p. 72, applied to the cartesian square
E
implies that is a covering of E.
Let us prove b). Suppose that is surjective. Then, for every element of I, the mapping is surjective and the space , endowed with the mapping , is a covering of (I, p. 71, Corollary 2 of Proposition 2). It follows from the particular case treated above that the -space is a covering. Consequently, E is a covering of B.
Let B be a topological space, let E and be coverings of B, and let be a B-morphism We have seen that is a covering under each of the two following assumptions: 1) the covering E is locally of finite degree (I, p. 76, Corollary 1) ; 2) the space B is locally connected (I, p. 81, Proposition 7). This phenomenon may be explained as follows.
Let F and be discrete topological spaces and let be a B-morphism. The mapping pr of B into the space is continuous (TG, X, p. 28, th. 3). If U is an open set of B such that the mapping is constant on U, the mapping deduced from is a trivializable covering (I, p. 69, prop. 1).
The space is none other than the set of mappings of F into endowed with the topology deduced from the topology of the product space by the canonical identification. For this topology, the space is totally disconnected (I, p. 84, prop. 10). Consequently, if the space B is connected, the mapping is constant (I, p. 82, prop. 4); if the space B is locally connected, the mapping is locally constant. When the set F is finite, the space is discrete and the mapping is locally constant.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.