Let (E,p) be a principal fibre space with base B and group G; let (E′,p′) be a principal fibre space with base B′ and group G′. We define a law of operation on the right of the group G×G′ on the space E×E′ by putting (x,x′)⋅(g,g′)=(x⋅g,x′⋅g′) for x∈E,x′∈E′,g∈G and g′∈G′; this operation is continuous. Let U be an open subset of B and f:U×G→p−1(U) a trivialization of the U-space (p−1(U),pU);
let U′ be an open subset of B′ and f′:U′×G′→(−p′1)(U′) a trivialization of the U′-space ((−p′1)(U′),pU′). The mapping ((b,b′),(g,g′))↦ (f(b,g),f′(b′,g′)) is a (U×U′)-isomorphism f′′ of (U×U′)×(G×G′)
onto p−1(U)×(−p′1)(U′) and one has
f′′((b,b′),(gh,g′h′))=(f(b,gh),f′(b′,g′h′))=f′′((b,b′),(g,g′))⋅(h,h′)
It follows that the (B×B′)-space E×E′, endowed with the law of operation of G×G′ defined above, is a principal fibre space, called the product of the principal fibre spaces E and E′.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.