Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 01QL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01QL].

Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 5. Revêtements principaux

Let B be a topological space, (E,p)(E, p) a B-space, and G a discrete topological group operating on the right on E. The following assertions are equivalent:

(i) The B-space E is a principal covering with group G;

(ii) For every g∈Gg\in G and every x∈Ex\in E, one has p(x⋅g)=p(x)p(x\cdot g) =p(x), the mapping pp induces a homeomorphism of E/GE/G onto B, and the mapping θ:(x,g)↦(x,x⋅g)\theta : (x, g)\mapsto (x, x\cdot g) is a homeomorphism of E×GE\times G onto E×BEE\times_BE;

(iii) The group G operates continuously and freely in E, the mapping pp is etale, and its fibres are the orbits of G.

(i)⇒\Rightarrow(ii) : This follows from I, p. 91 and from proposition 3 of I, p. 94.

(ii)⇒\Rightarrow(iii): Under assumption (ii), the action law of G is continuous, and the mapping pp is surjective and open (TG, III, p. 10, lemma 2). Let x∈Ex\in E; the mapping θ\theta induces a bijection of {x}×G\{x\} \times G onto {x}×\{x\} \times p−1(p(x))\overset{-1}{p}(p(x)), hence the group G operates freely and its orbits are the fibres of pp. If ee denotes the identity element of G, the diagonal of E×BEE\times_BE is the image of E×{e}E\times \{e\} under the homeomorphism θ\theta. Since the group G is discrete, the set {e}\{e\} is open in G, therefore the diagonal ΔE\Delta_E is open in E×BEE\times_BE. By proposition 7 of I, p. 31, the mapping pp is étale.

(iii)⇒\Rightarrow(i): Every fibre of pp being an orbit of the operation of G in E, the mapping pp is surjective. Since the mapping pp is étale, for every point bb of B, there exists an open neighbourhood U of bb and a continuous section ss of pp over U. The set s(U)s(U) is open in E and ss induces a homeomorphism of U onto s(U)s(U) (I, p. 30, cor. 3). For every g∈Gg\in G, the set s(U)⋅gs(U)\cdot g is open in E and the union of the sets s(U)⋅gs(U)\cdot g, for all g∈Gg\in G, is equal to p−1(U)\overset{-1}{p}(U). If gg and g′g' are two distinct elements of G, the sets s(U)⋅gs(U)\cdot g and s(U)⋅g′s(U)\cdot g' are disjoint, since G operates freely in E. The mapping f:U×G→f: U\times G\rightarrow p−1(U)\overset{-1}{p}(U) defined by f(u,g)=s(u)⋅gf(u, g) =s(u)\cdot g for (u,g)∈U×G(u, g)\in U\times G is therefore a homeomorphism of U×GU\times G onto p−1(U)\overset{-1}{p}(U), compatible with the right operations of G. By definition, E is therefore a principal covering of B with group G.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.