Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 01RA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01RA].

Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 5. Revêtements principaux

Let B be a topological space, let G be a topological group, let (E,p)(E, p) be a principal fibred space over B with group G and let F be a topological space in which the group G operates continuously on the left.

a) The topological space E×GFE\times^GF endowed with the continuous mapping pF:E×GF→Bp^F: E\times^GF\rightarrow B deduced from the mapping p∘p\circpr1:E×F→B_1: E\times F\rightarrow B by passing to the quotient is a locally trivial fibred space over B of fibre type F; it is trivializable if the fibred space over B E is trivializable.

b) Let π:E×F→E×GF\pi : E\times F\rightarrow E\times^GF be the canonical surjection. The mapping μ:E×F→E×B(E×GF)\mu: E\times F\rightarrow E\times_B(E\times^GF) which associates to (x,f)(x, f) the element (x,π(x,f))(x, \pi (x, f)) is a homeomorphism whose inverse mapping is a trivialization of the locally trivial fibred space over E (E×B(E×GF)(E\times_B(E\times^GF), pr1)_1).

Suppose first that E is the trivial principal fibred space over B B×GB\times G. By example 2, the space E×GFE\times^GF is then identified with B×FB\times F and the mapping pFp^F with the first projection pr1:B×F→B_1: B\times F\rightarrow B, which proves that (E×GF,pF)(E\times^GF, p^F) is a trivializable fibred space over B in this case. In the general case, every point of B possesses a neighbourhood U such that the mapping pU:p−1(U)→Up_U:\overset{-1}{p}(U)\rightarrow U makes p−1(U)\overset{-1}{p}(U) into a trivializable principal fibred space over U. From what precedes, (p−1(U)×GF→U,(pU)F)(\overset{-1}{p}(U)\times^GF\rightarrow U,(p_U)^F) is a trivializable fibred space over U. By the above lemma, applied to the case where B′=UB'= U and h:U→Bh: U\rightarrow B is the canonical injection, the same is

true of the fibred space over U ((p−F1)(U),(pF)U(p^{-F1})(U),(p^F)_U) deduced from (E×GF,pF)(E\times^GF, p^F) by restriction above U. This proves that (E×GF,pF)(E\times^GF, p^F) is a locally trivial fibred space over B and concludes the proof of assertion a).

The mapping θ:E×G→E×BE\theta : E\times G\rightarrow E\times_BE defined by θ(x,g)=(x,x⋅g)\theta (x, g) = (x, x\cdot g) is a homeomorphism (I, p. 94, prop. 3) compatible with the operations of G on E×GE\times G and on E×BEE\times_BE given by ((x,g),g′)↦(x,gg′)((x, g), g')\mapsto (x, gg') and ((x,y),g′)↦(x,yg′)((x, y), g')\mapsto (x, yg') respectively. By passing to quotients, θ\theta therefore induces a homeomorphism θ′\theta ' of (E×G)×GF(E\times G)\times^GF onto (E×B(E\times_B E)×GFE)\times^GF. The mapping μ\mu is the composite of the homeomorphism E×F→E\times F\rightarrow (E×G)×GF(E\times G)\times^GF (example 2), of θ′\theta ', and of the canonical homeomorphism (E×BE)×GF→E×B(E×GF)(E\times_BE)\times^GF\rightarrow E\times_B(E\times^GF) (I, p. 105, lemma), whence b).

Under the hypotheses of proposition 7, the locally trivial fibred B-space (E×GF,pFE\times^GF, p^F) is called the locally trivial fibred space of fibre type F associated with the principal fibred space (E,p)(E, p). All the fibres of the B-space E×GFE\times^GF are homeomorphic to the space F. In particular, if the space F is discrete, the mapping pFp^F is a covering.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.