Bourbaki

Proposition 11

Tag 01RP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01RP].

Topologie algébrique, chapter I, § 5. Revêtements principaux

Let B be a topological space, G a topological group and U=(Ui)i∈I\mathscr{U}= (U_i)_{i\in I} an open covering of B.

a) Every principal fibre space over B with group G which is trivializable over U\mathscr{U} is isomorphic to a principal fibre space defined by a cocycle of Zcont1(B,U,G)Z^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{U},G).

b) Let (E,p)(E, p) and (E′,p′)(E', p') be principal fibre spaces over B which are trivializable over U\mathscr{U}. Let (fi)i∈I((f_i)_{i\in I}( resp. (fi′)i∈I)(f'_i)_{i\in I}) be a trivialization of (E,p)(E, p) ( resp. of (E′,p′)(E', p')) adapted to U\mathscr{U}, and let us denote by (gij)(i,j)∈I×I(g_{ij})_{(i,j)\in I\times I} ( resp. (gi,j′)(i,j)∈I×I(g'_{i,j})_{(i,j)\in I\times I}) the cocycle defined by this trivialization. Then the principal fibre spaces (E,p)(E, p) and (E′,p′)(E', p') are isomorphic if and only if these cocycles are cohomologous.

Let us prove b). Let φ:E→E′\varphi : E\rightarrow E' be an isomorphism of principal fibre spaces with base B and group G. For each i∈Ii\in I, let hih_i be the continuous mapping of UiU_i into G defined by

(b,hi(b))=fi′∘φ∘fi−1(b,e) (b, h_i(b)) =f'_i\circ \varphi \circ f_i^{-1}(b, e)

Since, for each i∈I,fii\in I,f_i and fi′f'_i are compatible with the operations of G, one has for every b∈Uib\in U_i and every g∈Gg\in G,

(fi′∘φ∘fi−1)(b,g)=(b,hi(b)g) (f'_i\circ \varphi \circ f_i^{-1})(b, g) = (b, h_i(b)g)

and

(fi∘φ−1∘(fi′)−1)(b,g)=(b,hi(b)−1g) (f_i\circ \varphi^{-1}\circ (f'_i)^{-1})(b, g) = (b, h_i(b)^{-1}g)

Hence, for every pair (i,j)∈I×I(i, j)\in I\times I and every point bb of Ui∩Uj:U_i\cap U_j: fi′∘(fj′)−1(b,e)=(fi′∘φ∘fi−1)∘(fi∘fj−1)∘(fj∘φ−1∘(fj′)−1)(b,e)f'_i\circ (f'_j)^{-1}(b, e) = (f'_i\circ \varphi \circ f_i^{-1})\circ (f_i\circ f_j^{-1})\circ (f_j\circ \varphi^{-1}\circ (f'_j)^{-1})(b, e)

=(b,hi(b)gij(b)hj(b)−1) = (b, h_i(b)g_{ij}(b)h_j(b)^{-1})

so that one has

gij′(b)=hi(b)gij(b)hj(b)−1 g'_{ij}(b) =h_i(b)g_{ij}(b)h_j(b)^{-1}

This proves that the cocycles (gij)(g_{ij}) and (gij′)(g'_{ij}) are cohomologous.

Conversely, suppose that these cocycles are cohomologous, and let (hi)i∈I(h_i)_{i\in I} be a family of continuous mappings hi:Ui→Gh_i: U_i\rightarrow G such that gij′(b)=hi(b)gij(b)hj(b)−1g'_{ij}(b) =h_i(b)g_{ij}(b)h_j(b)^{-1} for i,j∈Ii,j\in I and b∈Ui∩Ujb\in U_i\cap U_j. For

i∈Ii\in I, let φi:p−1(Ui)→(−p′1)(Ui)\varphi_i:\overset{-1}{p}(U_i)\rightarrow (^-{p'}^1)(U_i) be the mapping defined by fi′∘φi∘f'_i\circ \varphi_i\circ fi−1(b,g)=(b,hi(b)g)f_i^{-1}(b, g) = (b, h_i(b)g), for b∈Uib\in U_i and g∈Gg\in G. It is an isomorphism of principal fibre spaces with basis UiU_i and group G. For (i,j)∈(i, j)\in I×II\times I, let us denote by γij\gamma_{ij} and γij′\gamma '_{ij} the gluing homeomorphisms associated as above with the cocycles (gij)(g_{ij}) and (gij′)(g'_{ij}) respectively (I, p. 115, formula (5)), so that fi(b,g)=γij∘fj(b,g)f_i(b, g) =\gamma_{ij}\circ f_j(b, g) and fi′(b,g)=γij′∘fj′(b,g)f'_i(b, g) =\gamma '_{ij}\circ f'_j(b, g) for every (b,g)∈(Ui∩Uj)×G(b, g)\in (U_i\cap U_j)\times G. Consequently, for (i,j)∈I×I(i, j)\in I\times I and (b,g)∈(Ui∩Uj)×G(b, g)\in (U_i\cap U_j)\times G, we have the relations

fi′∘φj∘fi−1(b,g)=γij′∘(fj′∘φj∘fj−1)(b,gij(b)−1g) f'_i\circ \varphi_j\circ f_i^{-1}(b, g) =\gamma '_{ij}\circ (f'_j\circ \varphi_j\circ f_j^{-1})(b, g_{ij}(b)^{-1}g)
=γij′(b,hj(b)gij(b)−1g) =\gamma '_{ij}(b, h_j(b)g_{ij}(b)^{-1}g)
=(b,gij′(b)hj(b)gij(b)−1g) = (b, g'_{ij}(b)h_j(b)g_{ij}(b)^{-1}g)
=(b,hi(b)g)=fi′∘φi∘fi−1(b,g) = (b, h_i(b)g) =f'_i\circ \varphi_i\circ f_i^{-1}(b, g)

This proves that φi\varphi_i and φj\varphi_j coincide on p−1(Ui∩Uj)\overset{-1}{p}(U_i\cap U_j). The morphisms φi\varphi_i therefore glue together to a B-morphism of principal fibre spaces from E to E′E'. Assertion b) follows, since every morphism of principal fibre spaces with basis B and group G is an isomorphism (I, p. 93, Prop. 1).

Let us now prove a). Let (E,p)(E, p) be a principal fibre space with group G endowed, for each i∈Ii\in I, with a trivialization fi:p−1(Ui)→f_i:\overset{-1}{p}(U_i)\rightarrow Ui×GU_i\times G over UiU_i. Let (gij)(g_{ij}) be the cocycle defined by this family, and let F then be the principal fibre space defined by the cocycle (gij)(g_{ij}). By construction, the principal fibre space F is endowed with a trivialization over U\mathscr{U}; this trivialization defines the cocycle (gij)(g_{ij}). By assertion b), the principal fibre space (E,p)(E, p) is isomorphic to F.

Let B be a topological space and G a topological group. Let (E,p)(E, p) be a principal fibre space with basis B and group G. Let ss be a section of the surjective mapping pp (E, II, p. 19, Prop. 8). The mapping f:B×G→Ef: B\times G\rightarrow E defined by f(b,g)=s(b)⋅gf(b, g) =s(b)\cdot g is a bijection compatible with the action of G. Endow B×GB\times G with the topology obtained by transport of structure; (B×G(B\times G, pr1)_1) is then a principal fibre space with basis B and group G isomorphic to E. There therefore exists a set T of principal fibre spaces with basis B and group G such that every principal fibre space with basis B and group G is isomorphic to an element of T. Let us denote by P(B,G)P(B,G) the set of isomorphism classes of principal fibre spaces with basis B and group G (E, II, p. 47).

Let U=(Ui)i∈I\mathscr{U}= (U_i)_{i\in I} be an open covering of B. Let P(B,U,G)P(B,\mathscr{U},G) denote the subset of P(B,G)P(B,G) consisting of the isomorphism classes of principal bundles which are trivializable over U\mathscr{U}. By proposition 11, there exists a mapping rUr_{\mathscr{U}} of Hcont1(B,U,G)H^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{U},G) into P(B,U,G)P(B,\mathscr{U},G) which associates with the class of a cocycle (gij)∈Zcont1(B,U,G)(g_{ij})\in Z^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{U},G) the isomorphism class of the principal fibre space defined by this cocycle; it is a bijection (loc. cit.). The inverse bijection sUs_{\mathscr{U}} associates with the isomorphism class in Hcont1(B,U,G)H^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{U},G) of a principal fibre space E, trivializable over U\mathscr{U}, the class of the cocycle defined by an arbitrary family of trivializations of E over U\mathscr{U}. Under this correspondence, the isomorphism class of the trivial principal fibre space B×GB\times G corresponds to the cohomology class of the constant cocycle gij=eg_{ij}=e, also called the trivial cocycle.

By virtue of the definition of a principal fibre space, the set P(B,G)P(B,G) is the union of the sets of the form P(B,U,G)P(B,\mathscr{U},G), where U\mathscr{U} is an open covering of B.

Let U=(Ui)i∈I\mathscr{U}= (U_i)_{i\in I} be an open covering of B and let V=(Vk)k∈K\mathscr{V}= (V_k)_{k\in K} be an open covering of B finer than U\mathscr{U}. We have P(B,U,G)⊂P(B,\mathscr{U},G)\subset P(B,V,G)P(B,\mathscr{V},G); let iVUi_{\mathscr{V} \mathscr{U}} denote the canonical injection defined by this inclusion. Choose a mapping φ:K→I\varphi : K\rightarrow I such that Vk⊂Uφ(k)V_k\subset U_{\varphi(k)} for every k∈Kk\in K. Given a cocycle (gij)∈Zcont1(B,U,G)(g_{ij})\in Z^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{U},G), set, for every pair (k,ℓ)∈K×K,g‾kℓ=gφ(k)φ(ℓ)∣Vk∩Vℓ(k, \ell )\in K\times K,\overline{g}_{k\ell}=g_{\varphi(k)\varphi(\ell)}|V_k\cap V_{\ell}.

The family (g‾kℓ)(\overline{g}_{k\ell}) is a cocycle on B, with values in G, subordinate to V\mathscr{V}. If (gij′)∈Zcont1(B,U,G)(g'_{ij})\in Z^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{U},G) is a cocycle cohomologous to the cocycle (gij)(g_{ij}), the cocycle (g‾kℓ′)(\overline{g}'_{k\ell}) deduced from (gkℓ′)(g'_{k\ell}) is cohomologous to the cocycle (g‾kℓ)(\overline{g}_{k\ell}). It follows that there is a mapping

c(φ):Hcont1(B,U,G)→Hcont1(B,V,G) c(\varphi ): H^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{U},G)\rightarrow H^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{V},G)

which associates with the class of (gij)(g_{ij}) the class of (g‾kℓ)(\overline{g}_{k\ell}).

Let E be a principal fibre space with base B and group G and, for every i∈i\in I, let fi:EUi→Ui×Gf_i: E_{U_i}\rightarrow U_i\times G be a trivialization of the principal UiU_i-bundle EUiE_{U_i}. For every k∈k\in K, let fk′:EVk→Vk×Gf'_k: E_{V_k}\rightarrow V_k\times G be the trivialization deduced from fφ(k)f_{\varphi(k)} by passing to subsets. Let (gij)∈Zcont1(B,U,G)(g_{ij})\in Z^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{U},G) be the cocycle defined by the family (fi)(f_i); the cocycle defined by the family (fk′)(f'_k) is precisely the cocycle (g‾kℓ)(\overline{g}_{k\ell}) defined above. Thus, the following diagram is commutative:

Hcont1(B,U,G)c(φ)Hcont1(B,V,G) H^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{U},G)^{c(\varphi)}H^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{V},G)
rUrVr_{\mathscr{U}}r_{\mathscr{V}}
P(B,U,G)iVUP(B,V,G) P(B,\mathscr{U},G)^{i_{\mathscr{V} \mathscr{U}}}P(B,\mathscr{V},G)

Since the mappings rUr_{\mathscr{U}} and rVr_{\mathscr{V}} are bijective, the mapping c(φ)c(\varphi ), analogously to iVUi_{\mathscr{V} \mathscr{U}}, is an injection and does not depend on the choice of φ\varphi. Henceforth we shall write cVUc_{\mathscr{V} \mathscr{U}} instead of c(φ)c(\varphi ).

Let R\mathscr{R} be the set of elements of P(P(B))\mathfrak{P}(\mathfrak{P}(B)) which are open coverings of B. For every open covering U\mathscr{U} of B, there exists an open covering V\mathscr{V} belonging to R\mathscr{R} such that U\mathscr{U} is both finer and coarser than U\mathscr{U}. The set R\mathscr{R} is ordered and filtering for the relation ⩽\leqslant defined by U⩽V\mathscr{U}\leqslant \mathscr{V} if V\mathscr{V} is a covering finer than U\mathscr{U}. It follows from the foregoing that an inductive system (Hcont1(B,U,G),cVU)(H^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{U},G), c_{\mathscr{V} \mathscr{U}}) relative to the filtered ordered set R\mathscr{R} has been defined and that the family (rU)(r_{\mathscr{U}}) is an inductive system of bijective mappings of (Hcont1(B,U,G),cVU)(H^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{U},G), c_{\mathscr{V} \mathscr{U}}) into (P(B,U,G),iVU)(P(B,\mathscr{U},G), i_{\mathscr{V} \mathscr{U}}). If we denote by Hcont1(B,G)H^1_{cont}(B,G) the inductive limit of the system (Hcont1(B,U,G),cVU)(H^1_{cont}(B,\mathscr{U},G), c_{\mathscr{V} \mathscr{U}}) and by r:Hcont1(B,G)→P(B,G)r: H^1_{cont}(B,G)\rightarrow P(B,G) the inductive limit of the family (rU)(r_{\mathscr{U}}), we therefore have:

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.