Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 01UZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01UZ].

Topologie algébrique, chapter II, § 5. Coégalisateur

The unique group homomorphism

λ:Go∗F(K)→(G/K)γ(o) \lambda : G_o*F(K)\rightarrow (G/K)_{\gamma(o)}

such that λ(f)=γo(f)\lambda (f) =\gamma_o(f) for f∈Gof\in G_o and λ([k])=γ(ck)\lambda ([k]) =\gamma (c_k) for k∈Kk\in K is surjective. Its kernel is the smallest normal subgroup of Go∗F(K)G_o*F(K) containing the following elements:

(R2R_2)r2(k,f)=[k]−1f[k](ck−1k∗(f)−1ck)r_2(k, f) = [k]^{-1}f[k](c^{-1}_kk^*(f)^{-1}c_k)

for k∈Kk\in K and f∈Gof\in G_o;

(R3′R'_3)r3′(k,a)=[k](ck−1k∗(f(a,k))−1f(a,k)))r'_3(k, a) = [k](c^{-1}_kk^*(f_{(a,k)})^{-1}f_{(a,k)}))

for k∈K−{e}k\in K-\{e\} and a∈Aka\in A_k

(R3′′R''_3)r3′′(k,h)=[kh]−1[k][h](ch−1h∗(ck−1)ckh)r''_3(k, h) = [kh]^{-1}[k][h](c^{-1}_hh^*(c^{-1}_k)c_{kh})

for kk and h∈Kh\in K.

Since G is transitive, the mapping which to an element k∈Kk\in K associates the orbit of (o,k)(o, k) is a bijection of K onto the set of orbits of H. Thus Orb(G) is identified with {o}\{o\} and Orb(H) with K. The framework Γ0\Gamma_0 of the pair (φ,ψ)(\varphi , \psi ) is then identified with the quiver having a unique vertex oo and whose set of arrows is K. Let T be the subquiver of Γ0\Gamma_0 with set of vertices {o}\{o\} and whose set of arrows is empty; the associated graph is the unique maximal tree of the graph Γ~0\widetilde{\Gamma}_0.

The family (o,(o,k)k∈K,(eo)k∈K,(ck)k∈K,T,o)(o,(o, k)_{k\in K},(e_o)_{k\in K},(c_k)_{k\in K},T, o) is a basic equipment of the pair (φ,ψ)(\varphi , \psi ).

The mapping f↦(f,k)f\mapsto (f, k) defines an isomorphism of the isotropy group GoG_o onto the isotropy group H(o,k)H_{(o,k)}; by means of this isomorphism, the homomorphisms φk\varphi_k and ψk\psi_k of H(o,k)H_{(o,k)} into GoG_o defined by Prop. 5 of II, p. 208 are given by

(3) φk(f,k)=f\varphi_k(f, k) =f et ψk(f,k)=ck−1k∗(f)ck\psi_k(f, k) =c^{-1}_kk^*(f)c_k,

for k∈Kk\in K and f∈Gof\in G_o.

The quiver H×GHH\times_GH is the equalizer in H×HH\times H of the quiver morphisms ψ∘\psi \circ pr1_1 and φ∘\varphi \circ pr2_2. Its vertices are the pairs ((a,k),(b,h))((a, k),(b, h)) where aa and bb are vertices of G and kk and hh elements of K such that b=k∗ab=k^*a, and its arrows are the pairs ((f,k),(g,h))((f, k),(g, h)) where ff and gg are arrows of G, and kk and hh elements of K such that g=k∗fg=k^*f; the origin of the arrow ((f,k),(g,h))((f, k),(g, h)) is equal to ((o(f),k),(o(g),h))((o(f), k),(o(g), h)); its end is equal to ((t(f),k),(t(g),h))((t(f), k),(t(g), h)).

One then defines a quiver morphism μ\mu from H×GHH\times_GH into H by putting μ((a,k),(b,h))=(a,kh)\mu((a, k),(b, h)) = (a, kh) and μ((f,k),(g,h))=(f,kh)\mu((f, k),(g, h)) = (f, kh). We have φ∘μ=φ∘\varphi \circ \mu=\varphi \circ pr1_1 and ψ∘μ=ψ∘\psi \circ \mu=\psi \circ pr2_2.

Let xx and yy be vertices of H such that φ(x)=φ(y)\varphi (x) =\varphi (y). Then there exist a vertex aa of G and elements kk and hh of K such that x=(a,k)x= (a, k) and y=(a,h)y= (a, h). Put z=(h∗a,h−1k)z= (h^*a, h^{-1}k); then μ(y,z)=x\mu(y, z) =x. This shows that the pair (φ,ψ)(\varphi , \psi ) satisfies the hypotheses of Prop. 4 (II, p. 202).

A vertex (a,k)(a, k) of H belong to the groupoid Ker(φ,ψ\varphi , \psi ), equalizer of φ\varphi and ψ\psi, if and only if k∗a=ak^*a=a, that is to say, if kk belong to the stabilizer of the vertex aa in the group K. Let A1A_1 be the set of pairs (a,k)(a, k), for k∈Kk\in K and a∈Aka\in A_k; it meets all the orbits of the subgroupoid Ker(φ,ψ\varphi , \psi ) of H. Let Z1Z_1 be the subset of Ω(Γ~)\Omega (\widetilde{\Gamma}) formed by the sequences of the form (((a,k),1))(((a, k),1)), for (a,k)∈A1(a, k)\in A_1. For z=((a,k),1)∈Z1,(f(a,k),k)\mathbf{z}= ((a, k),1)\in Z_1,(f_{(a,k)}, k) is an arrow of H joining (a,k)(a, k) to (o,k)(o, k). Put f(z)=((f(a,k),k))f(\mathbf{z}) = ((f_{(a,k)}, k)).

The set A2A_2 of vertices of H×GHH\times_GH of the form ((o,k),(k∗o,h))((o, k),(k^*o, h)), for (k,h)∈K2(k, h)\in K^2, meets all the orbits of H×GHH\times_GH. Observe also that one has μ((o,k),(k∗o,h))=(o,kh)\mu((o, k),(k^*o, h)) = (o, kh). The arrows (eo,k)(e_o, k), (ck,h)(c_k, h), (eo,kh)(e_o, kh) in H join respectively (o,k)(o, k), (k∗o,h)(k^*o, h), (o,kh)(o, kh) to (o,k)(o, k), (o,h)(o, h) and (o,kh)(o, kh). Let Z2Z_2 denote the set of sequences of the form (((o,k),1),((k∗o,h),1),((o,kh),−1))(((o, k),1),((k^*o, h),1),((o, kh),-1)) in Ω(Γ~)\Omega (\widetilde{\Gamma}); for such an element z\mathbf{z} of Z2Z_2, put f(z)=((eo,k),(ck,h),(eo,kh))f(\mathbf{z}) = ((e_o, k),(c_k, h),(e_o, kh)).

By Prop. 4 of II, p. 202, the set Z=Z1∪Z2Z = Z_1\cup Z_2 and the family (f(z))z∈Z(f(\mathbf{z}))_{z\in Z} is a complementary equipment.

Let k∈Kk\in K and let a∈Aka\in A_k. The element C((a,k),1)C((a, k),1) of the group Go∗F(K)G_o*F(K) defined by formula (2) of II, p. 208 is equal to

ck−1ψ((f(a,k),k))−1φ(f(a,k))eo[k]=(ck−1k∗(f(a,k))−1f(a,k))[k](4) c^{-1}_k\psi ((f_{(a,k)}, k))^{-1}\varphi (f_{(a,k)})e_o[k] =(c^{-1}_kk^*(f_{(a,k)})^{-1}f_{(a,k)})[k] \tag{4}

Let kk and h∈Kh\in K be given. One verifies that the element

C(((o,k),1),((k∗o,h),1),((o,kh),−1)) C(((o, k),1),((k^*o, h),1),((o, kh),-1))

of the group Go∗F(K)G_o*F(K) defined by formula (2) of II, p. 208 is equal to

[k][h](ch−1h∗(ck−1)ckh)[kh]−1(5) [k][h](c^{-1}_hh^*(c^{-1}_k)c_{kh})[kh]^{-1} \tag{5}

The elements r3′(e,a)r'_3(e, a) given by the relations (R3′R'_3) for k=ek=e are all equal to [e]ce−1[e]c^{-1}_e, an element of the group Go∗F(K)G_o*F(K) which one obtains by applying the relation (R3′′R''_3) to k=h=ek=h=e. Taking account of relations (3), (4), and (5), the proposition therefore follows from II, p. 208, Prop. 5.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.