Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 01ZX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01ZX].

Topologie algébrique, chapter III, § 5. Homotopie et revêtements (cas des espaces localement connexes par arcs)

Let B be a topological space locally path-connected and let E be a set endowed with an operation without local monodromy φ\varphi of the groupoid ϖ(B)\varpi (B), relative to a mapping p:E→Bp: E\rightarrow B. Then there exists on E a unique topology for which the following conditions are satisfied:

(i) The set E endowed with this topology and the mapping pp is a covering of B;

(ii) The canonical operation of ϖ(B)\varpi (B) on this covering is identical with the operation φ\varphi.

The uniqueness of such a topology follows from lemma 1 of III, p. 312, where one takes for gg the identical mapping of E. To prove its existence, one may moreover suppose that B is connected and nonempty.

Let us suppose first of all that the operation φ=(φa,b)(a,b)∈B×B\varphi = (\varphi_{a,b})_{(a,b)\in B\times B} of the groupoid ϖ(B)\varpi (B) on the set E, relative to pp, is without monodromy.

Let aa be a point of B. For every point b∈Bb\in B, there exists a path cc in B joining aa to bb. If γ∈ϖa,b(B)\gamma \in \varpi_{a,b}(B) denotes the class of the path cc, the bijection φa,b(γ):Ea→Eb\varphi_{a,b}(\gamma ): E_a\rightarrow E_b is independent of the path cc, since the operation is without monodromy; let fa,bf_{a,b} denote this bijection. The mapping Φa:B×Ea→\Phi_a: B\times E_a\rightarrow E defined by (b,x)↦fa,b(x)(b, x)\mapsto f_{a,b}(x) is a bijection; the inverse bijection associates with x∈Ex\in E the pair (p(x),fp(x),a(x))(p(x), f_{p(x),a}(x)). Endow the set EaE_a with the discrete topology, so that the B-space B×EaB\times E_a is a trivial covering of B. By transport of structure, the bijection Φa\Phi_a endows E with a topology which makes it into a covering of B.

Let us prove that the canonical operation of ϖ(B)\varpi (B) on E is identical with the operation φ\varphi. Let xx be a point of EaE_a and bb a point of B. Let cc be a path in B joining the point aa to the point bb; the mapping t↦Φa(c(t),x)t\mapsto \Phi_a(c(t), x) is then a path in E joining the point xx to the point Φa(b,x)=fa,b(x)\Phi_a(b, x) =f_{a,b}(x). If γ∈ϖa,b(B)\gamma \in \varpi_{a,b}(B) denotes the class of the path cc, we thus have x⋅γ=fa,b(x)x\cdot \gamma =f_{a,b}(x). This proves that the canonical operation of ϖ(B)\varpi (B) on the covering E and the operation φ\varphi coincide on the classes of paths with origin aa. Since these classes generate the groupoid ϖ(B)\varpi (B), the two operations are equal.

Let us now treat the general case. Let B\mathscr{B} be the set of open subsets V of E such that ϖ(V)\varpi (V) operates without monodromy on p−1(V)\overset{-1}{p}(V). By hypothesis, the elements of B\mathscr{B} cover B. From the preceding, there exists for every V∈BV\in \mathscr{B} a unique topology on the set p−1(V)\overset{-1}{p}(V) such that (p−1(V),pV)(\overset{-1}{p}(V), p_V) is a covering of V and that the canonical operation of ϖ(V)\varpi (V) on this covering coincides with the operation induced by φ\varphi.

Let V and V′∈BV'\in \mathscr{B}. The topology on p−1(V∩V′)\overset{-1}{p}(V\cap V') induced by the topology of p−1(V)\overset{-1}{p}(V) (resp. of p−1(V′)\overset{-1}{p}(V')) defined above makes it into a covering of V∩V′V\cap V' on which the canonical operation of ϖ(V∩V′)\varpi (V\cap V') is induced by the operation φ\varphi. These topologies therefore coincide with that of p−1(V∩V′)\overset{-1}{p}(V\cap V'). There then exists a unique topology on E inducing on each p−1(V)\overset{-1}{p}(V) the topology previously defined (cf. I, § 2, p. 16).

When E is endowed with this topology, the mapping pp is continuous and the B-space E is a covering. The canonical operation of ϖ(B)\varpi (B) on this covering coincides with the operation φ\varphi on the classes of paths whose image is contained in one of the open sets of B\mathscr{B}. By lemma 4 of III, p. 272, these classes generate the groupoid ϖ(B)\varpi (B). It follows that these two operations are equal (II, p. 167).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.