Bourbaki

Example 1

Tag 0231, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0231].

Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 5. Théorème de van Kampen

This property is satisfied under one of the following assumptions:

(i) The spaces X and Y are delacable, the space X×YXX\times_YX is locally arcwise connected, the mapping ff is surjective, proper, separated, with locally connected fibres;

(ii) The spaces X and Y are delacable, the mapping ff is surjective, proper, separated, with finite fibres, the diagonal ΔX\Delta_X of X×YXX\times_YX is open and its complement is locally connected;

(iii) The spaces X and Y are delacable, the mapping ff is surjective, open and possesses the path lifting property;

(iv) Every point of Y possesses a neighbourhood above which there exists a continuous section of the mapping ff.

Indeed, under each of these assumptions, the mapping ff is surjective; it is also strict by virtue of I, p. 18, example 2. Finally, the morphism ϖ′(f)\varpi '(f) is an isomorphism, both under the assumptions (i), (ii) or (iii) according to IV, p. 398, th. 1, and under assumption (iv) ( IV, p. 400, th. 2).

The prop. 5 of II, p. 208 describes the isotropy groups of the groupoid Coeg(ff). The purpose of this noo^o is to make explicit, when ff satisfies the property (VK), the description of the Poincaré groups of Y which is deduced from it by composition with the isomorphism of groupoids ϖ′(f)\varpi '(f). The following nosos^{os} will be devoted to important particular cases.

Suppose that the mapping ff satisfies the property (VK).

Put I=π0(X),J=π0(Z),K=π0(W)\mathsf{I}=\pi_0(X),\mathsf{J}=\pi_0(Z),\mathsf{K}=\pi_0(W); for j∈Jj\in \mathsf{J} and s∈{1,2}s\in \{1,2\}, put is(j)=π0(ps)(j)i_s(j) =\pi_0(p_s)(j) ; for k∈Kk\in \mathsf{K} and s,t∈{1,2,3}s,t\in \{1,2,3\}, put jst(k)=π0(qst)(k)j_{st}(k) =\pi_0(q_{st})(k). Denote by Γ\mathsf{\Gamma} the skeleton of the pair (ϖ(p1),ϖ(p2))(\varpi (p_1), \varpi (p_2)) of morphisms of groupoids from ϖ(Z)\varpi (Z) into ϖ(X)\varpi (X) (II, p. 185, def. 3). It is the quiver (I,J,π0(p1),π0(p2))(\mathsf{I},\mathsf{J}, \pi_0(p_1), \pi_0(p_2)), since the orbits of the Poincaré groupoid of a topological space are the arcwise connected components of this space.

Suppose moreover that Y is arcwise connected and nonempty. According to II, p. 200, remark 2, π0(Γ)\pi_0(\mathsf{\Gamma}) is then in bijection with the set of orbits of the groupoid Coeg(ff); since the mapping ff satisfies the property (VK), the groupoid Coeg(ff) is isomorphic to the groupoid ϖ(Y)\varpi (Y). The graph Γ\mathsf{\Gamma} is thus connected and nonempty.

Call van Kampen data of ff the data of the following elements:

(i) for every i∈Ii\in \mathsf{I}, a point a(i)\mathsf{a}(i) of the path-connected component ii of X ;

(ii) for every j∈Jj\in \mathsf{J}, a point b(j)=(b1(j),b2(j))\mathsf{b}(j) = (\mathsf{b}_1(j),\mathsf{b}_2(j)) of the path-connected component jj of Z ;

(iii) for every k∈Kk\in \mathsf{K}, a point c(k)=(c1(k),c2(k),c3(k))\mathsf{c}(k) = (\mathsf{c}_1(k),\mathsf{c}_2(k),\mathsf{c}_3(k)) of the path-connected component kk of W;

(iv) for every j∈Jj\in \mathsf{J}, the class β1(j)\beta_1(j) of a path in X joining b1(j)\mathsf{b}_1(j) to a(i1(j))\mathsf{a}(i_1(j)) and the class β2(j)\beta_2(j) of a path in X joining b2(j)\mathsf{b}_2(j) to a(i2(j))\mathsf{a}(i_2(j));

(v) for every k∈Kk\in \mathsf{K} and for every pair (s,t)(s, t) equal to (1,2)(1,2), (2,3)(2,3) or (1,3)(1,3), the class γst(k)\gamma_{st}(k) of a path in Z joining (cs(k),ct(k))(\mathsf{c}_s(k),\mathsf{c}_t(k)) to b(jst(k))\mathsf{b}(j_{st}(k));

(vi) a subquiver T\mathsf{T} of Γ\mathsf{\Gamma} whose associated graph is a maximal tree of the graph Γ~\widetilde{\mathsf{\Gamma }};

(vii) an element i0i_0 of I\mathsf{I}.

Let us choose a van Kampen datum of ff. Then, (a,b,β1,β2,T,i0)(\mathsf{a},\mathsf{b}, \beta_1, \beta_2,\mathsf{T}, i_0) is a basic equipment of the pair (ϖ(p1),ϖ(p2))(\varpi (p_1), \varpi (p_2)) of groupoid morphisms from ϖ(Z)\varpi (Z) into ϖ(X)\varpi (X) (II, p. 192, déf. 4). Moreover, the triples

z=((q12(c(k)),1),(q23(c(k)),1),(q13(c(k)),−1)) \mathsf{z}= ((q_{12}(\mathsf{c}(k)),1),(q_{23}(\mathsf{c}(k)),1),(q_{13}(\mathsf{c}(k)),-1))

and the classes of paths (γ1,2(k),γ2,3(k),γ1,3(k))(\gamma_{1,2}(k), \gamma_{2,3}(k), \gamma_{1,3}(k)), where kk describes K\mathsf{K}, define a complementary equipment of the pair (ϖ(p1),ϖ(p2))(\varpi (p_1), \varpi (p_2)) (II, p. 208, déf. 3 ; II, p. 205, exemple ; II, p. 205, remarque). We shall say that the complete equipment of the coequalizer Coeg(ff) thus defined is deduced from the van Kampen datum of ff that we have chosen.

For every j∈Jj\in \mathsf{J}, let φj:π1(Z,b(j))→π1(X,a(i1(j)))\varphi_j:\pi_1(Z,\mathsf{b}(j))\rightarrow \pi_1(X,\mathsf{a}(i_1(j))) and ψj:π1(Z,b(j))→π1(X,a(i2(j)))\psi_j:\pi_1(Z,\mathsf{b}(j))\rightarrow \pi_1(X,\mathsf{a}(i_2(j))) denote the group homomorphisms defined by

φj=\varphi_j= Int(β1(j)\beta_1(j))−1∘(p1)∗,v↦β1(j)−1((p1)∗(v))β1(j)^{-1}\circ (p_1)_*,v\mapsto \beta_1(j)^{-1}((p_1)_*(v))\beta_1(j)

(1)

ψj=\psi_j= Int(β2(j)\beta_2(j))−1∘(p2)∗,v↦β2(j)−1((p2)∗(v))β2(j)^{-1}\circ (p_2)_*,v\mapsto \beta_2(j)^{-1}((p_2)_*(v))\beta_2(j),

for v∈π1(Z,b(j))v\in \pi_1(Z,\mathsf{b}(j)). For every k∈Kk\in \mathsf{K} and every s∈{1,2,3}s\in \{1,2,3\}, let λs(k)\lambda_s(k) denote the class of a loop at the point a(is(k))\mathsf{a}(i_s(k)) in X defined by

(2)

λ1(k)=β1(j13(k))−1⋅((p1)∗(γ13(k)))−1⋅((p1)∗(γ12(k)))⋅β1(j12(k)) \lambda_1(k) =\beta_1(j_{13}(k))^{-1}\cdot ((p_1)_*(\gamma_{13}(k)))^{-1}\cdot ((p_1)_*(\gamma_{12}(k)))\cdot \beta_1(j_{12}(k))

λ2(k)=β2(j12(k))−1⋅((p2)∗(γ12(k)))−1⋅((p1)∗(γ23(k)))⋅β1(j23(k))\lambda_2(k) =\beta_2(j_{12}(k))^{-1}\cdot ((p_2)_*(\gamma_{12}(k)))^{-1}\cdot ((p_1)_*(\gamma_{23}(k)))\cdot \beta_1(j_{23}(k)),

λ3(k)=β2(j23(k))−1⋅((p2)∗(γ23(k)))−1⋅((p2)∗(γ13(k)))⋅β2(j13(k)) \lambda_3(k) =\beta_2(j_{23}(k))^{-1}\cdot ((p_2)_*(\gamma_{23}(k)))^{-1}\cdot ((p_2)_*(\gamma_{13}(k)))\cdot \beta_2(j_{13}(k))

Let τ\tau denote the unique groupoid morphism from Grp(Γ\mathsf{\Gamma}) into ϖ(Y)\varpi (Y) such that the mapping Som(τ\tau ) maps i∈Ii\in \mathsf{I} onto f(a(i))f(\mathsf{a}(i)) and Fl(τ\tau ) maps j∈Jj\in \mathsf{J} onto the class of paths f∗(β1(j))−1f∗(β2(j))f_*(\beta_1(j))^{-1}f_*(\beta_2(j)) joining f(a(i1(j)))f(\mathsf{a}(i_1(j)))

a(i1(k)) \mathsf{a}(i_1(k))
λ1(k) \lambda_1(k)
b1(j12(k))b1(j13(k)) \mathsf{b}_1(j_{12}(k))\mathsf{b}_1(j_{13}(k))
b2(j12(k))b2(j13(k)) \mathsf{b}_2(j_{12}(k))\mathsf{b}_2(j_{13}(k))
c1(k) \mathsf{c}_1(k)
c2(k)c3(k) \mathsf{c}_2(k)\mathsf{c}_3(k)
λ2(k)λ3(k) \lambda_2(k)\lambda_3(k)
a(i2(k))b1(j23(k))b2(j23(k))a(i3(k)) \mathsf{a}(i_2(k))\mathsf{b}_1(j_{23}(k))\mathsf{b}_2(j_{23}(k))\mathsf{a}(i_3(k))

to f(a(i2(j)))f(\mathsf{a}(i_2(j))) in Y. For i∈Ii\in \mathsf{I}, let di∈d_i\in Grp(Γ\mathsf{\Gamma}) be the class of the unique path without backtracking joining i0i_0 to ii in the tree T~\widetilde{\mathsf{T}} and put δi=\delta_i= τ(di)\tau (d_i).

If S is a set, recall that F(S) denotes the free group on S; the image in F(S) of an element s∈Ss\in S by the canonical mapping is denoted by [s][s], or by ss if there is no possible confusion.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-6, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.