This property is satisfied under one of the following assumptions:
(i) The spaces X and Y are delacable, the space X×YX is locally arcwise connected, the mapping f is surjective, proper, separated, with locally connected fibres;
(ii) The spaces X and Y are delacable, the mapping f is surjective, proper, separated, with finite fibres, the diagonal ΔX of X×YX is open and its complement is locally connected;
(iii) The spaces X and Y are delacable, the mapping f is surjective, open and possesses the path lifting property;
(iv) Every point of Y possesses a neighbourhood above which there exists a continuous section of the mapping f.
Indeed, under each of these assumptions, the mapping f is surjective; it is also strict by virtue of I, p. 18, example 2. Finally, the morphism ϖ′(f) is an isomorphism, both under the assumptions (i), (ii) or (iii) according to IV, p. 398, th. 1, and under assumption (iv) ( IV, p. 400, th. 2).
The prop. 5 of II, p. 208 describes the isotropy groups of the groupoid Coeg(f). The purpose of this noo is to make explicit, when f satisfies the property (VK), the description of the Poincaré groups of Y which is deduced from it by composition with the isomorphism of groupoids ϖ′(f). The following nosos will be devoted to important particular cases.
Suppose that the mapping f satisfies the property (VK).
Put I=π0(X),J=π0(Z),K=π0(W); for j∈J and s∈{1,2}, put is(j)=π0(ps)(j) ; for k∈K and s,t∈{1,2,3}, put jst(k)=π0(qst)(k). Denote by Γ the skeleton of the pair (ϖ(p1),ϖ(p2)) of morphisms of groupoids from ϖ(Z) into ϖ(X) (II, p. 185, def. 3). It is the quiver (I,J,π0(p1),π0(p2)), since the orbits of the Poincaré groupoid of a topological space are the arcwise connected components of this space.
Suppose moreover that Y is arcwise connected and nonempty. According to II, p. 200, remark 2, π0(Γ) is then in bijection with the set of orbits of the groupoid Coeg(f); since the mapping f satisfies the property (VK), the groupoid Coeg(f) is isomorphic to the groupoid ϖ(Y). The graph Γ is thus connected and nonempty.
Call van Kampen data of f the data of the following elements:
(i) for every i∈I, a point a(i) of the path-connected component i of X ;
(ii) for every j∈J, a point b(j)=(b1(j),b2(j)) of the path-connected component j of Z ;
(iii) for every k∈K, a point c(k)=(c1(k),c2(k),c3(k)) of the path-connected component k of W;
(iv) for every j∈J, the class β1(j) of a path in X joining b1(j) to a(i1(j)) and the class β2(j) of a path in X joining b2(j) to a(i2(j));
(v) for every k∈K and for every pair (s,t) equal to (1,2), (2,3) or (1,3), the class γst(k) of a path in Z joining (cs(k),ct(k)) to b(jst(k));
(vi) a subquiver T of Γ whose associated graph is a maximal tree of the graph Γ;
(vii) an element i0 of I.
Let us choose a van Kampen datum of f. Then, (a,b,β1,β2,T,i0) is a basic equipment of the pair (ϖ(p1),ϖ(p2)) of groupoid morphisms from ϖ(Z) into ϖ(X) (II, p. 192, déf. 4). Moreover, the triples
z=((q12(c(k)),1),(q23(c(k)),1),(q13(c(k)),−1))
and the classes of paths (γ1,2(k),γ2,3(k),γ1,3(k)), where k describes K, define a complementary equipment of the pair (ϖ(p1),ϖ(p2)) (II, p. 208, déf. 3 ; II, p. 205, exemple ; II, p. 205, remarque). We shall say that the complete equipment of the coequalizer Coeg(f) thus defined is deduced from the van Kampen datum of f that we have chosen.
For every j∈J, let φj:π1(Z,b(j))→π1(X,a(i1(j))) and ψj:π1(Z,b(j))→π1(X,a(i2(j))) denote the group homomorphisms defined by
Let τ denote the unique groupoid morphism from Grp(Γ) into ϖ(Y) such that the mapping Som(τ ) maps i∈I onto f(a(i)) and Fl(τ ) maps j∈J onto the class of paths f∗(β1(j))−1f∗(β2(j)) joining f(a(i1(j)))
a(i1(k))
λ1(k)
b1(j12(k))b1(j13(k))
b2(j12(k))b2(j13(k))
c1(k)
c2(k)c3(k)
λ2(k)λ3(k)
a(i2(k))b1(j23(k))b2(j23(k))a(i3(k))
to f(a(i2(j))) in Y. For i∈I, let di∈ Grp(Γ) be the class of the unique path without backtracking joining i0 to i in the tree T and put δi=τ(di).
If S is a set, recall that F(S) denotes the free group on S; the image in F(S) of an element s∈S by the canonical mapping is denoted by [s], or by s if there is no possible confusion.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.