Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 023S, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 023S].

Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 5. Théorème de van Kampen

The mapping f:C→Af: C\rightarrow A is proper and separated; its fibres are finite.

Let us prove that ff is closed. Let X be a closed subset of C. Let us prove that its image is closed in A. For each ℓ∈L\ell \in L, X∩BℓX\cap B_{\ell} is closed in BℓB_{\ell}, hence the space Y=⋃ℓ∈Lhℓ−1(X∩Bℓ)Y =\bigcup_{\ell\in L}h^{-1}_{\ell}(X\cap B_{\ell}) is closed in B since L is finite. The saturation X∗X^* of X for the equivalence relation R is then equal to X∪⋃ℓ∈Lhk(Y)X\cup \bigcup_{\ell\in L}h_k(Y), hence is closed in C. Consequently, f(X)=f(X∗)f(X) =f(X^*) is closed in A, which was to be proved.

The fibres of ff are the equivalence classes of the relation R; they are finite. Consequently, the mapping ff is proper (TG, I, p. 75, Theorem 1).

Lastly, let us show that ff is separated. Let xx and yy be distinct points of C which have the same image under ff. There therefore exists a point b∈Bb\in B and distinct elements ℓ\ell and m∈Lm\in L such that x=hℓ(b)x=h_{\ell}(b) and y=hm(b)y=h_m(b). Consequently, NℓN_{\ell} and NmN_m are disjoint neighbourhoods of xx and yy in C, whence the required assertion by virtue of Prop. 1 of I, p. 25.

Assume in addition the following hypotheses:

– the space A is simply connected and connected;

– the space C is simply connected;

– the space B is connected and locally arcwise connected.

Let us put I=π0(C)I =\pi_0(C); if ii is an element of I, let CiC_i denote the connected component ii of C. Let η:L→I\eta : L\rightarrow I denote the mapping which associates to an element ℓ∈L\ell \in L the connected component of C containing BℓB_{\ell}. The mapping η\eta is surjective. For, arguing by contradiction, consider a connected component X of C which meets no set BℓB_{\ell}. It is an open and closed subset of C, saturated with respect to the equivalence relation R. Hence its image f(X)f(X) is an open and closed subset of A, disjoint from B. Since A is assumed connected and B nonempty, f(X)f(X) is empty, whence a contradiction.

Let σ:I→L\sigma : I\rightarrow L be a section of the mapping η\eta; put τ=σ∘η\tau =\sigma \circ \eta and T=σ(I)T =\sigma (I).

Choose a point bb of B. For every ℓ∈L\ell \in L, put bℓ=hℓ(b)b_{\ell}=h_{\ell}(b) and choose the class βℓ\beta_{\ell} of a path joining bℓb_{\ell} to bτ(ℓ)b_{\tau(\ell)} in C; if ℓ=τ(ℓ)\ell =\tau (\ell ), choose for βℓ\beta_{\ell} the class of the constant path whose image is bℓb_{\ell}. For every ℓ∈L\ell \in L, let ϑℓ\vartheta_{\ell} denote the homomorphism from π1(B,b)\pi_1(B, b) into π1(C,bτ(ℓ))\pi_1(C, b_{\tau(\ell)}) defined by

ϑℓ(v)=\vartheta_{\ell}(v) = Int(βℓ\beta_{\ell})−1((hℓ)∗(v))=βℓ−1(hℓ)∗(v)βℓ^{-1}((h_{\ell})_*(v)) =\beta_{\ell}^{-1}(h_{\ell})_*(v)\beta_{\ell},

for every v∈π1(B,b)v\in \pi_1(B, b). Finally, fix an element ℓ0\ell_0 of L such that ℓ0=\ell_0= τ(ℓ0)\tau (\ell_0).

Let Q\mathsf{Q} be the unique group homomorphism

Q:(i∗∈Iπ1(Ci,bσ(i)))∗F(L−T)→π1(A,b) \mathsf{Q}:(_i*_{\in I}\pi_1(C_i, b_{\sigma(i)}))*F(L-T)\rightarrow \pi_1(A, b)

such that Q(ℓ)=f∗(βℓ)\mathsf{Q}(\ell ) =f_*(\beta_{\ell}) for every ℓ∈\ell \in L - T and which coincides with π1(f,bσ(i))\pi_1(f, b_{\sigma(i)}) on π1(Ci,bσ(i))\pi_1(C_i, b_{\sigma(i)}) for every i∈Ii\in I.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-6, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.