Lemma 2
Tag 023S, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 023S].
Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 5. Théorème de van Kampen
The mapping is proper and separated; its fibres are finite.
Let us prove that is closed. Let X be a closed subset of C. Let us prove that its image is closed in A. For each , is closed in , hence the space is closed in B since L is finite. The saturation of X for the equivalence relation R is then equal to , hence is closed in C. Consequently, is closed in A, which was to be proved.
The fibres of are the equivalence classes of the relation R; they are finite. Consequently, the mapping is proper (TG, I, p. 75, Theorem 1).
Lastly, let us show that is separated. Let and be distinct points of C which have the same image under . There therefore exists a point and distinct elements and such that and . Consequently, and are disjoint neighbourhoods of and in C, whence the required assertion by virtue of Prop. 1 of I, p. 25.
Assume in addition the following hypotheses:
– the space A is simply connected and connected;
– the space C is simply connected;
– the space B is connected and locally arcwise connected.
Let us put ; if is an element of I, let denote the connected component of C. Let denote the mapping which associates to an element the connected component of C containing . The mapping is surjective. For, arguing by contradiction, consider a connected component X of C which meets no set . It is an open and closed subset of C, saturated with respect to the equivalence relation R. Hence its image is an open and closed subset of A, disjoint from B. Since A is assumed connected and B nonempty, is empty, whence a contradiction.
Let be a section of the mapping ; put and .
Choose a point of B. For every , put and choose the class of a path joining to in C; if , choose for the class of the constant path whose image is . For every , let denote the homomorphism from into defined by
Int(),
for every . Finally, fix an element of L such that .
Let be the unique group homomorphism
such that for every L - T and which coincides with on for every .
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.