Remark
Tag 023U, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 023U].
Topologie algébrique, chapter IV, § 5. Théorème de van Kampen
Let A be a topological space, let B be a closed subset of A, and let U be an open neighbourhood of B in A. Suppose that the set U-B is the union of a finite family of pairwise disjoint open sets. For each , put . Let denote the topological sum of the spaces A-B and , for ; let also and , for , denote the canonical injections. Let C be the quotient topological space of by the finest equivalence relation S for which the points and are equivalent, for each and each ; let be the canonical mapping.
Let us prove that the space A is recovered from the space C by identification of the sets by means of the homeomorphisms .
For every , the set is open in A-B and in . The mappings and are homeomorphisms of the spaces A-B and , for , onto open subsets of C (TG, I, p. 17, Prop. 9). For every , the set is closed in and saturated for the equivalence relation S. Hence the set is closed in C and the mapping induces a homeomorphism of B onto loc. cit.). Analogously, for every , the set is an open neighbourhood of ; the sets are mutually disjoint.
By passing to the quotient, the mapping deduced from the canonical injections into A of the spaces A-B and , for , induces a
continuous mapping . If is a point of B, the fibre is the set of points , for . The equivalence relation on C associated with the mapping is the relation R defined at the beginning of the number. Let denote the union of the family . By construction, the mapping induces a homeomorphism of onto A-B and, for , a homeomorphism of onto . We shall prove that the mapping is closed; the topology of A will therefore be the quotient topology of C by the equivalence relation R (I, p. 18, Example 2). For this, let us prove that if F is a subset of A such that is closed in A-B and such that is closed in , for , the set F is closed in A. The set U, union of the family , is open in A and the sets , for , constitute a finite closed covering of it. Hence the set is closed in U (TG, I, p. 18, Prop. 3). The sets U and A-B form an open covering of A, therefore the set F is closed in A (loc. cit.).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.