Bourbaki

Lemma 2 (Fekete Lemma)

Tag 025Y, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 025Y].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 2. Algèbres normées

Let (an)n⩾1(a_n)_{n\geqslant 1} be a sequence of real numbers. Suppose that

an+m⩽an+am a_{n+m}\leqslant a_n+a_m

for all n⩾1n\geqslant 1 and all m⩾1m\geqslant 1. Then the sequence (an/n)n⩾1(a_n/n)_{n\geqslant 1} converges and satisfies

limn→+∞ann=_{n\rightarrow+\infty}\frac{a_n}{n}= infn⩾1ann_{n\geqslant 1}\frac{a_n}{n}.

Put a0=0a_0= 0 ; the inequality an+m⩽an+ama_{n+m}\leqslant a_n+a_m remains valid for all n⩾n\geqslant 0 and all m⩾0m\geqslant 0. Fix an integer m⩾m\geqslant 1. For every integer n⩾1n\geqslant 1, let q(n)q(n) and r(n)r(n) be the integers such that n=q(n)m+r(n)n=q(n)m+r(n) and 0⩽r(n)<m0\leqslant r(n)< m (E, III, p. 39, th. 1). The hypothesis then implies

ann⩽aq(n)mn+ar(n)n⩽q(n)amn+ar(n)n⩽q(n)nam+mn \frac{a_n}{n}\leqslant \frac{a_{q(n)m}}{n}+\frac{a_{r(n)}}{n}\leqslant \frac{q(n)a_m}{n}+\frac{a_{r(n)}}{n}\leqslant \frac{q(n)}{n}a_m+\frac{m}{n}

Letting nn tend to +∞+\infty, we deduce that lim supn(an/n)⩽am/m_n(a_n/n)\leqslant a_m/m since q(n)/n→1/mq(n)/n\rightarrow 1/m. Since this holds for every m⩾1m\geqslant 1, we therefore have

lim supn→+∞ann⩽_{n\rightarrow+\infty}\frac{a_n}{n}\leqslant infm⩾1amm⩽_{m\geqslant 1}\frac{a_m}{m}\leqslant lim infn→+∞ann_{n\rightarrow+\infty}\frac{a_n}{n}.

These inequalities prove the convergence of the sequence (an/n)n⩾1(a_n/n)_{n\geqslant 1} as well as the formula lim an/n=a_n/n= infn⩾1an/n_{n\geqslant 1}a_n/n.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.