Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 027T, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 027T].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 3. Algèbres de Banach commutatives

For every closed subset Φ of X, let IΦI_{\Phi} be the set of f∈C0(X)f\in \mathscr{C}_0(X) that are zero on Φ. Then Φ↦IΦ\Phi \mapsto I_{\Phi} is a bijection of the set of closed subsets of X onto the set of closed ideals of C0(X)\mathscr{C}_0(X).

The set IΦI_{\Phi} is a closed ideal of C0(X)\mathscr{C}_0(X).

Let Φ≠Φ′\Phi \not= \Phi ' be closed subsets of X. Exchanging Φ and Φ′\Phi ' if necessary, we may suppose that there exists x∈Φ′x\in \Phi ' such that x∉Φx\notin \Phi, and then there exists a function f∈C0(X)f\in \mathscr{C}_0(X) which is zero on Φ and non-zero at xx (TG, IX, p. 43, prop. 1). We have f∈IΦf\in I_{\Phi} and f∉IΦ′f\notin I_{\Phi'}, so that the mapping Φ↦IΦ\Phi \mapsto I_{\Phi} is injective.

Let I be a closed ideal of C0(X)\mathscr{C}_0(X). Let Φ be the set of x∈Xx\in X such that f(x)=0f(x) = 0 for every f∈If\in I; this is a closed subset of X, and one has I⊂IΦI\subset I_{\Phi}. Let us prove that IΦ⊂II_{\Phi}\subset I, which will imply that I=IΦI = I_{\Phi} and complete the proof of the proposition.

Let f∈IΦf\in I_{\Phi}. For every real number ε>0\varepsilon >0, let CεC_{\varepsilon} denote the set of x∈Xx\in X such that ∣f(x)∣⩾ε|f(x)|\geqslant \varepsilon. Since ff tends to 0 at infinity, the set CεC_{\varepsilon} is compact. Let x∈Cεx\in C_{\varepsilon}; since f(x)≠0f(x)\not= 0 and f∈IΦf\in I_{\Phi}, one has x∉Φx\notin \Phi; by definition of Φ, there then exists a function φx∈I\varphi_x\in I such that ∣φx(x)∣>1|\varphi_x(x)|>1, hence such that ∣φx(y)∣>1|\varphi_x(y)|>1 for every yy belonging to a neighbourhood VxV_x of xx. The open sets Vx∩CεV_x\cap C_{\varepsilon} cover CεC_{\varepsilon}. Since the set CεC_{\varepsilon} is compact, there exists a finite subset Tε⊂XT_{\varepsilon}\subset X such that

Cε⊂⋃x∈TεVx C_{\varepsilon}\subset \bigcup_{x\in T_{\varepsilon}}V_x

Then the element

1

gε=∑φxφx‾⩾0 g_{\varepsilon}=\sum\varphi_x\overline{\varphi_x}\geqslant 0
ε \varepsilon
x∈Tεx\in T_{\varepsilon}

of C0(X)\mathscr{C}_0(X) belongs to I, and one has gε⩾ε−1g_{\varepsilon}\geqslant \varepsilon^{-1} on CεC_{\varepsilon}. The function

fε=fgε1+gε f_{\varepsilon}=\frac{f g_{\varepsilon}}{1 + g_{\varepsilon}}

belongs to I. For x∉Cεx \notin C_{\varepsilon}, one has

∣f(x)−fε(x)∣⩽2ε |f(x)-f_{\varepsilon}(x)|\leqslant 2\varepsilon

and for x∈Cεx\in C_{\varepsilon}, one has

∣f(x)−fε(x)∣=∣f(x)∣1+gε(x)⩽ε∣f(x)∣ |f(x)-f_{\varepsilon}(x)|=\frac{|f(x)|}{1 + g_{\varepsilon}(x)}\leqslant \varepsilon |f(x)|

Thus fεf_{\varepsilon} converges uniformly to ff on X when ε\varepsilon tends to 0. Hence f∈I‾f\in \overline{I}, whence f∈If\in I since I is closed.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.