Let K⊂CΛ be a polynomially convex compact subset and U a neighbourhood of K. There exists a finite subset Λ0 of Λ such that, for every subset Λ′ of Λ containing Λ0, the set prΛ′(U) contains the polynomially convex hull of prΛ′(K).
Since K is compact, there exists a family of compact disks Dλ in C with center 0 and radii Rλ such that K is contained in the product D=∏λDλ. For every P∈C[(Xλ)], let KP be the set of
x∈CΛ such that
∣P(x)∣⩽ supc∈K∣P(c)∣.
One has
D∩P⋂KP=K(3)
which is contained in U. Thus, the space D is the union of the open set D∩U and the family of open sets D - KP for P∈C[(Xλ)]. Since D is compact, there exists an integer q⩾1 and polynomials P1,...,Pq∈C[(Xλ)] such that:
D∩KP1∩⋯∩KPq⊂U(4)
There exists a finite subset Λ0⊂ Λ such that Pi∈C[(Xλ)λ∈Λ0] for 1⩽i⩽q. Let us prove that Λ0 verifies the assertion of the lemma.
Let Λ′ be a subset of Λ containing Λ0. Let E be the subset of CΛ′ formed by the elements c=(cλ)λ∈Λ′ defined by the inequalities ∣cλ∣⩽Rλ for λ∈Λ′, and
∣Pi(c)∣⩽ supc∈K∣Pi(c)∣
for i=1,...,q. The subset E is polynomially convex (lemma 3) and formula (3) proves that prΛ′(K)⊂E.
On the other hand, let c=(cλ)λ∈Λ′∈E; let d=(dλ)λ∈Λ be the element of CΛ defined by dλ=cλ for λ∈Λ′ and dλ=0 for λ∈Λ- Λ′. Then (4) implies that d∈U, and hence that c∈ prΛ′(U). Thus, E⊂ prΛ′(U), which completes the proof.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.