Bourbaki

Lemma 6

Tag 028Z, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 028Z].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 3. Algèbres de Banach commutatives

Let K⊂CΛK\subset \mathbf{C}^{\Lambda} be a polynomially convex compact subset and U a neighbourhood of K. There exists a finite subset Λ0\Lambda_0 of Λ such that, for every subset Λ′\Lambda ' of Λ containing Λ0\Lambda_0, the set prΛ′(U)_{\Lambda'}(U) contains the polynomially convex hull of prΛ′(K)_{\Lambda'}(K).

Since K is compact, there exists a family of compact disks DλD_{\lambda} in C\mathbf{C} with center 0 and radii RλR_{\lambda} such that K is contained in the product D=∏λDλD =\prod_{\lambda}D_{\lambda}. For every P∈C[(Xλ)]P\in \mathbf{C}[(X_{\lambda})], let KPK_P be the set of

x∈CΛx\in \mathbf{C}^{\Lambda} such that

∣P(x)∣⩽|P(x)|\leqslant supc∈K∣P(c)∣_{c\in K}|P(c)|.

One has

D∩⋂PKP=K(3) D\cap \bigcap_PK_P= K \tag{3}

which is contained in U. Thus, the space D is the union of the open set D∩UD\cap U and the family of open sets D - KPK_P for P∈C[(Xλ)]P\in \mathbf{C}[(X_{\lambda})]. Since D is compact, there exists an integer q⩾1q\geqslant 1 and polynomials P1,...,Pq∈C[(Xλ)]P_1, . . . ,P_q\in \mathbf{C}[(X_{\lambda})] such that:

D∩KP1∩⋯∩KPq⊂U(4) D\cap K_{P_1}\cap \cdots \cap K_{P_q}\subset U \tag{4}

There exists a finite subset Λ0⊂\Lambda_0\subset Λ such that Pi∈C[(Xλ)λ∈Λ0]P_i\in \mathbf{C}[(X_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in\Lambda_0}] for 1⩽i⩽q1\leqslant i\leqslant q. Let us prove that Λ0\Lambda_0 verifies the assertion of the lemma.

Let Λ′\Lambda ' be a subset of Λ containing Λ0\Lambda_0. Let E be the subset of CΛ′\mathbf{C}^{\Lambda'} formed by the elements c=(cλ)λ∈Λ′c= (c_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in\Lambda'} defined by the inequalities ∣cλ∣⩽Rλ|c_{\lambda}|\leqslant R_{\lambda} for λ∈Λ′\lambda \in \Lambda ', and

∣Pi(c)∣⩽|P_i(c)|\leqslant supc∈K∣Pi(c)∣_{c\in K}|P_i(c)|

for i=1,...,qi= 1, . . . ,q. The subset E is polynomially convex (lemma 3) and formula (3) proves that prΛ′(K)⊂E_{\Lambda'}(K)\subset E.

On the other hand, let c=(cλ)λ∈Λ′∈Ec= (c_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in\Lambda'}\in E; let d=(dλ)λ∈Λd= (d_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in\Lambda} be the element of CΛ\mathbf{C}^{\Lambda} defined by dλ=cλd_{\lambda}=c_{\lambda} for λ∈Λ′\lambda \in \Lambda ' and dλ=0d_{\lambda}= 0 for λ∈Λ\lambda \in \Lambda- Λ′\Lambda '. Then (4) implies that d∈Ud\in U, and hence that c∈c\in prΛ′(U)_{\Lambda'}(U). Thus, E⊂E\subset prΛ′(U)_{\Lambda'}(U), which completes the proof.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.