Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 02H4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02H4].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 8. Algèbres de fonctions continues sur un espace compact

Let f↦∥f∥Bf\mapsto \|f\|_B be a norm making B into a Banach algebra.

a) The mapping jj has norm ⩽1\leqslant 1 in L(B;C(X))\mathscr{L}(B;\mathscr{C}(X)) ;

b) The radical of the algebra B is zero ;

c) The mapping ev is continuous from X into X(B)\mathsf{X}(B) ;

d) If B separates the points of X, then the mapping ev is a homeomorphism of X onto a closed subset of X(B)\mathsf{X}(B).

One can identify X with X(C(X))\mathsf{X}(\mathscr{C}(X)) and GC(X)\mathscr{G}_{\mathscr{C}(X)} with the identity mapping (example 1 of I, p. 36). The mapping ev is then identified with X(j)\mathsf{X}(j), which proves c).

For every function f∈Bf\in B and every x∈Xx\in X, one has GB(f\mathscr{G}_B(f)(evx_x) =f(x)=f(x), whence

∥f∥C(X)=\|f\|_{\mathscr{C}(X)}= supx∈X∣GB(f_{x\in X}|\mathscr{G}_B(f)(evx_x)∣⩽ϱB(f)⩽∥f∥B|\leqslant \varrho_B(f)\leqslant \|f\|_B,

(cf. prop. 7 of I, p. 38, a)) which entails a). Moreover, this shows that the Gelfand transform of B is injective, whence b) (prop. 8 of I, p. 38). If B separates the points of X, then the mapping ev is injective, whence d) since X is compact.

We now consider the surjectivity of the mapping ev.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.