Let X be a compact space. Let B be a unital Banach subalgebra of C(X), endowed with the induced norm, separating the points of X. We identify X with a closed subset of X(B) (prop. 1, d)).
a) For every f∈B, the Gelfand transform GB(f) is a continuous function on X(B) which extends f and satisfies ∥f∥= sup∣GB(f)∣. In particular, GB is an isometric isomorphism of B onto a Banach subalgebra of C(X(B)) ;
b) Let B∗ be the set of invertible elements of B. For every character χ∈X(B), there exists a positive measure μ of mass 1 on X such that, for every f∈B∗, one has
log(∣χ(f)∣) =∫X log(∣f∣)dμ.
Moreover, for every f∈B, one has
χ(f)=∫Xfdμ
c) Suppose that every element of CR(X) is the uniform limit of real parts of functions belonging to B. Then, for every χ∈X(B), there exists a unique measure μχ⩾0 on X such that, for every function f∈B, one has
χ(f)=∫Xfdμχ
Moreover, for every function f∈B, one has
log(∣χ(f)∣)⩽∫X log(∣f∣)dμχ; the function log∣f∣ being bounded above, the integral exists in R∪{−∞}.
Assertion a) follows from the identification of X with a closed subspace of X(B) and from the inequalities
∥f∥= supx∈X∣f(x)∣⩽ supχ∈X(B)∣χ(f)∣= sup∣GB(f)∣=ϱB(f)⩽∥f∥
for every f∈B.
Let χ∈X(B) and n be a positive integer. Let λ1,...,λn∈R and f1,...,fn∈B∗. One then has
(1) ∑i=1nλi log(∣χ(fi)∣)⩽ supx∈X(∑i=1nλi log(∣fi(x)∣)).
Indeed, by continuity, it is enough to prove this inequality when the real numbers λi are rational. Reducing to a common denominator, one is reduced to the case where λi∈Z for every i. The inequality then takes the form
log(∣χ(f1λ1⋯fnλn)∣)⩽ supx∈X log(∣(f1λ1⋯fnλn)(x)∣),
and follows from the fact that ∥χ∥=1 (th. 1 of I, p. 29).
Let B′ be the vector space generated in CR(X) by the functions log(∣f∣) for f∈B∗. The upper bound (1) proves that there exists a linear form h of norm ⩽ 1 on B′ such that log(∣χ(f)∣) =h(log(∣f∣)) for every f∈B∗. By the Hahn-Banach theorem (EVT, II, p. 24, cor. 2), the linear form h extends to a linear form μ of norm ⩽1 on CR(X), that is, to a real measure μ on X such that ∥μ∥⩽1 (INT, III, §1, no5). Taking for the element f of B∗ the constant e= exp(1), one sees that 1=μ(1). Hence, writing μ=μ+−μ− as the difference of two mutually singular positive measures (INT, III, §1, no6, th. 3), one obtains
1=μ+(1)−μ−(1)⩽μ+(1)+μ−(1)=∥μ∥⩽1
whence μ=μ+⩾0 and ∥μ∥=1.
For every f∈B, we have exp(f)∈B∗, hence
∫XR(f)dμ=∫X log(∣exp(f)∣)dμ= log(∣χ(exp(f))∣)
= log(∣exp(χ(f))∣) =R(χ(f)),
where Cor. 1 of I, p. 66 has been used. Applying this equality to if, we conclude that ∫Xfdμ=χ(f). This establishes b).
Let us place ourselves under the assumptions of c). The existence of μχ follows from b). On the other hand, we have μχ(R(f))=R(χ(f)) for every f∈B. Since the real parts of functions f∈B are dense in CR(X) by hypothesis, the measure μχ is uniquely determined by χ.
Let f∈B. Let ε>0 be a real number. There exists, by hypothesis, a function g∈B such that
(2) R(g)−ε⩽ log(∣f∣+ε )⩽R(g)+ε.
Let h= exp(g)∈B∗. By (2), we have
∣h∣e−ε⩽∣f∣+ε⩽∣h∣eε(3)
The upper bound implies ∣fh−1∣⩽eε, whence ∣χ(fh−1)∣⩽eε, and consequently
(4) log(∣χ(f)∣)⩽ log(∣χ(h)∣) +ε=∫X log(∣h∣)dμχ+ε.
The lower bound in (3) then implies
log(∣χ(f)∣)⩽∫X log (∣f∣+ε)dμχ+2ε.
Letting ε tend to 0, we deduce that
log(∣χ(f)∣)⩽∫X log(∣f∣)dμχ.
This completes the proof.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.