Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 02H7, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02H7].

Théories spectrales, chapter I, § 8. Algèbres de fonctions continues sur un espace compact

Let X be a compact space. Let B be a unital Banach subalgebra of C(X)\mathscr{C}(X), endowed with the induced norm, separating the points of X. We identify X with a closed subset of X(B)\mathsf{X}(B) (prop. 1, d)).

a) For every f∈Bf\in B, the Gelfand transform GB(f)\mathscr{G}_B(f) is a continuous function on X(B)\mathsf{X}(B) which extends ff and satisfies ∥f∥=\|f\|= sup∣GB(f)∣|\mathscr{G}_B(f)|. In particular, GB\mathscr{G}_B is an isometric isomorphism of B onto a Banach subalgebra of C(X(B))\mathscr{C}(\mathsf{X}(B)) ;

b) Let B∗B^* be the set of invertible elements of B. For every character χ∈X(B)\chi \in \mathsf{X}(B), there exists a positive measure μ\mu of mass 1 on X such that, for every f∈B∗f\in B^*, one has

log(∣χ(f)∣|\chi (f)|) =∫X=\int_X log(∣f∣|f|)dμd\mu.

Moreover, for every f∈Bf\in B, one has

χ(f)=∫Xfdμ \chi (f) =\int_Xf d\mu

c) Suppose that every element of CR(X)\mathscr{C}_{\mathbf{R}}(X) is the uniform limit of real parts of functions belonging to B. Then, for every χ∈X(B)\chi \in \mathsf{X}(B), there exists a unique measure μχ⩾0\mu_{\chi}\geqslant 0 on X such that, for every function f∈Bf\in B, one has

χ(f)=∫Xfdμχ \chi (f) =\int_Xf d\mu_{\chi}

Moreover, for every function f∈Bf\in B, one has

log(∣χ(f)∣|\chi (f)|)⩽∫X\leqslant \int_X log(∣f∣|f|)dμχd\mu_{\chi}; the function log∣f∣|f| being bounded above, the integral exists in R∪{−∞}\mathbf{R}\cup \{-\infty \}.

Assertion a) follows from the identification of X with a closed subspace of X(B)\mathsf{X}(B) and from the inequalities

∥f∥=\|f\|= supx∈X∣f(x)∣⩽_{x\in X}|f(x)|\leqslant supχ∈X(B)∣χ(f)∣=_{\chi\in\mathsf{X}(B)}|\chi (f)|= sup∣GB(f)∣=ϱB(f)⩽∥f∥|\mathscr{G}_B(f)|=\varrho_B(f)\leqslant \|f\|

for every f∈Bf\in B.

Let χ∈X(B)\chi \in \mathsf{X}(B) and nn be a positive integer. Let λ1,...,λn∈R\lambda_1, . . . , \lambda_n\in \mathbf{R} and f1,...,fn∈B∗f_1, . . . , f_n\in B^*. One then has

(1) ∑i=1nλi\sum_{i=1}^n\lambda_i log(∣χ(fi)∣|\chi (f_i)|)⩽\leqslant supx∈X(∑i=1nλi_{x\in X}(\sum_{i=1}^n\lambda_i log(∣fi(x)∣|f_i(x)|)).

Indeed, by continuity, it is enough to prove this inequality when the real numbers λi\lambda_i are rational. Reducing to a common denominator, one is reduced to the case where λi∈Z\lambda_i\in \mathbf{Z} for every ii. The inequality then takes the form

log(∣χ(f1λ1⋯fnλn)∣|\chi (f_1^{\lambda_1}\cdots f_n^{\lambda_n})|)⩽\leqslant supx∈X_{x\in X} log(∣(f1λ1⋯fnλn)(x)∣|(f_1^{\lambda_1}\cdots f_n^{\lambda_n})(x)|),

and follows from the fact that ∥χ∥=1\|\chi \|= 1 (th. 1 of I, p. 29).

Let B′B' be the vector space generated in CR(X)\mathscr{C}_{\mathbf{R}}(X) by the functions log(∣f∣|f|) for f∈B∗f\in B^*. The upper bound (1) proves that there exists a linear form hh of norm ⩽\leqslant 1 on B′B' such that log(∣χ(f)∣|\chi (f)|) =h=h(log(∣f∣|f|)) for every f∈B∗f\in B^*. By the Hahn-Banach theorem (EVT, II, p. 24, cor. 2), the linear form hh extends to a linear form μ\mu of norm ⩽1\leqslant 1 on CR(X)\mathscr{C}_{\mathbf{R}}(X), that is, to a real measure μ\mu on X such that ∥μ∥⩽1\|\mu\|\leqslant 1 (INT, III, §1, no5^o5). Taking for the element ff of B∗B^* the constant e=e= exp(1), one sees that 1=μ(1)1 =\mu(1). Hence, writing μ=μ+−μ−\mu=\mu^+-\mu^- as the difference of two mutually singular positive measures (INT, III, §1, no6^o6, th. 3), one obtains

1=μ+(1)−μ−(1)⩽μ+(1)+μ−(1)=∥μ∥⩽1 1 =\mu^+(1)-\mu^-(1)\leqslant \mu^+(1) +\mu^-(1) =\|\mu\|\leqslant 1

whence μ=μ+⩾0\mu=\mu^+\geqslant 0 and ∥μ∥=1\|\mu\|= 1.

For every f∈Bf\in B, we have exp(ff)∈B∗\in B^*, hence

∫XR(f)dμ=∫X\int_X\mathscr{R}(f)d\mu=\int_X log(∣|exp(ff)∣|)dμ=d\mu= log(∣χ|\chi(exp(ff))∣|)

= log(∣|exp(χ(f)\chi (f))∣|) =R(χ(f))=\mathscr{R}(\chi (f)),

where Cor. 1 of I, p. 66 has been used. Applying this equality to ifif, we conclude that ∫Xfdμ=χ(f)\int_Xf d\mu=\chi (f). This establishes b).

Let us place ourselves under the assumptions of c). The existence of μχ\mu_{\chi} follows from b). On the other hand, we have μχ(R(f))=R(χ(f))\mu_{\chi}(\mathscr{R}(f)) =\mathscr{R}(\chi (f)) for every f∈Bf\in B. Since the real parts of functions f∈Bf\in B are dense in CR(X)\mathscr{C}_{\mathbf{R}}(X) by hypothesis, the measure μχ\mu_{\chi} is uniquely determined by χ\chi.

Let f∈Bf\in B. Let ε>0\varepsilon >0 be a real number. There exists, by hypothesis, a function g∈Bg\in B such that

(2) R(g)−ε⩽\mathscr{R}(g)-\varepsilon \leqslant log(∣f∣+ε|f|+\varepsilon )⩽R(g)+ε\leqslant \mathscr{R}(g) +\varepsilon.

Let h=h= exp(gg)∈B∗\in B^*. By (2), we have

∣h∣e−ε⩽∣f∣+ε⩽∣h∣eε(3) |h|e^{-\varepsilon}\leqslant |f|+\varepsilon \leqslant |h|e^{\varepsilon} \tag{3}

The upper bound implies ∣fh−1∣⩽eε|f h^{-1}|\leqslant e^{\varepsilon}, whence ∣χ(fh−1)∣⩽eε|\chi (f h^{-1})|\leqslant e^{\varepsilon}, and consequently

(4) log(∣χ(f)∣|\chi (f)|)⩽\leqslant log(∣χ(h)∣|\chi (h)|) +ε=∫X+\varepsilon =\int_X log(∣h∣|h|)dμχ+εd\mu_{\chi}+\varepsilon.

The lower bound in (3) then implies

log(∣χ(f)∣|\chi (f)|)⩽∫X\leqslant \int_X log (∣f∣+ε)dμχ+2ε(|f|+\varepsilon )d\mu_{\chi}+ 2\varepsilon.

Letting ε\varepsilon tend to 0, we deduce that

log(∣χ(f)∣|\chi (f)|)⩽∫X\leqslant \int_X log(∣f∣|f|)dμχd\mu_{\chi}.

This completes the proof.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.