Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 02M9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02M9].

Théories spectrales, chapter II, § 2. Classification

Let H be a locally compact group, and let R be one of the groups R\mathbf{R} or Z\mathbf{Z}. Let φ\varphi be a continuous morphism from R into H. If φ\varphi is not a topological isomorphism of R onto a subgroup of H, then the image of R in H is relatively compact.

Let I be the image of φ\varphi. After replacing H by I‾\overline{I}, we may suppose that I is dense in H. We must then prove that H is compact if φ\varphi is not a topological isomorphism of R onto I.

Suppose that there exists a neighbourhood V of ee in H and an integer M>0M>0 such that, for every t>Mt >M in R, one has φ(t)∉V\varphi (t)\notin V. Then φ\varphi is injective: if φ(u)=e\varphi (u) =e, one has φ(nu)=e\varphi (nu) =e for every integer n⩾1n\geqslant 1, hence the set Nu\mathbf{N}u is bounded in R, which means that u=0u= 0. The restriction of φ\varphi to [−M,M]∩R[-M,M]\cap R is therefore a homeomorphism onto its image, which contains V∩IV\cap I. The restriction of φ−1\varphi^{-1} to V∩IV\cap I being continuous, it follows that φ\varphi is a topological isomorphism of R onto I.

Suppose now that φ\varphi is not a topological isomorphism of R onto I. Let W be a relatively compact open neighbourhood of ee in H, and let V be a symmetric neighbourhood of ee such that V2⊂WV^2\subset W. For every x∈x\in H = I, there exists an element s∈s\in R such that x∈φ(s)Vx\in \varphi (s)V. According to the preceding paragraph and the assumption on φ\varphi, there exists t∈t\in R such that t>∣s∣t >|s| and φ(t)∈V\varphi (t)\in V. We then have x∈φ(t+s)φ(t)−1V⊂φ(t+s)Wx\in \varphi (t+s)\varphi (t)^{-1}V\subset \varphi (t+s)W, and t+s>0t+s >0. Consequently, the open sets φ(u)W\varphi (u)W for u>0u >0 form an open covering of H. Since W is relatively compact, there exist an integer n⩾1n\geqslant 1 and elements u1,...,unu_1, . . . , u_n of R, strictly positive, such that W⊂⋃1⩽i⩽nφ(ui)WW\subset \bigcup_{1\leqslant i\leqslant n}\varphi (u_i)W. Let U be the largest of the uiu_i.

Let x∈Hx\in H and let s=s= inf{t∈R∣t⩾0,φ(t)x−1∈W‾}\{t\in R|t\geqslant 0,\varphi (t)x^{-1}\in \overline{W}\}. Since W‾\overline{W} is compact, we then have φ(s)x−1∈W‾\varphi (s)x^{-1}\in \overline{W}. There exists an integer ii such that φ(s)x−1∈φ(ui)W\varphi (s)x^{-1}\in \varphi (u_i)W, whence φ(s−ui)x−1∈W‾\varphi (s-u_i)x^{-1}\in \overline{W}. The definition of ss implies s−ui<0s-u_i<0, whence s⩽Us\leqslant U. It follows that H=φ([0,U]∩R)WH =\varphi ([0,U]\cap R)W is compact.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.