Proposition 8
Tag 02OI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02OI].
Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 1. Applications linéaires compactes
Let E be a reflexive Banach space, B its unit ball, F a locally convex separated space and a linear mapping. The following conditions are equivalent :
(i) The linear mapping is compact ;
(ii) The set is a compact subset of F ;
(iii) The restriction of to B is a continuous mapping of the set B, endowed with the topology induced by , into F ;
(iv) For every sequence of points of B which converges to 0 for the topology , the sequence converges to 0 in F ;
(v) From every infinite sequence of points of , one can extract a sequence which converges in F ;
(vi) Every infinite sequence of points of has an adherence value in F.
Since E is a reflexive space, B is a compact subset of (TVS, IV, p. 17, prop. 6), hence (iii) implies (ii). Condition (ii) implies (i) by definition, and condition (i) implies (iii) by prop. 6. It is also elementary that (iii) implies (iv) and that (v) implies (vi).
We shall now prove that (iv) implies (v). Let be an infinite sequence of points of B. Since B is a compact subset of , there exists, by the theorem of mulian (TVS, IV, p. 36, th. 2), a sequence , extracted from the sequence , which converges in to a limit . The sequence is bounded in , hence in E (TVS, IV, p. 1, prop. 1); it is therefore contained in a homothetic set of B. If condition (iv) is satisfied, the sequence converges to 0 in F, and , which is a sequence extracted from , converges to . This proves that (iv) implies (v).
To conclude, let us prove that (vi) implies (ii). Let be the canonical injection of F into its completion. Under hypothesis (vi), is a precompact subset of F (TVS, IV, p. 32, prop. 1), hence is a relatively compact subset of (TG, II, n, p. 29) and is a compact linear mapping. By the equivalence already proved of conditions (i) and (ii), is a compact subset of . Consequently, is a compact subset of F.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.