Bourbaki

Theorem 2 (Leray-Schauder)

Tag 02OO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02OO].

Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 1. Applications linéaires compactes

Let X be a nonempty compact topological space, homeomorphic to a convex subset of a locally convex space. Every continuous mapping of X into X has a fixed point.

One may suppose that X is a convex subset of a locally convex space E. Let N be the closure of {0}\{0\} in E and π:E→E/N\pi : E\rightarrow E/N the canonical surjection. Since X is a separated space, the restriction of π\pi to X is injective; since X is compact, it therefore defines a homeomorphism of X onto a nonempty compact convex subset of the separated locally convex space E/NE/N. This allows us to suppose that the space E is separated.

Let f:X→Xf: X\rightarrow X be a continuous mapping. The mapping h:X→Eh: X\rightarrow E defined by h(x)=f(x)−xh(x) =f(x)-x is continuous; since X is compact, the image h(X)h(X) is closed. It is therefore enough to prove that 0 adheres to hh(X), that is to say that for every convex open neighbourhood U of 0 in E, there exists a point bb of X such that f(b)−b∈Uf(b)-b\in U.

Let U be a convex neighbourhood of 0 in E. For every a∈Xa\in X, let VaV_a denote the set of elements xx of X such that f(x)−f(a)∈Uf(x)-f(a)\in U. It is open in X and contains aa. Since X is compact and nonempty, there exists a nonempty finite subset A of X such that the sets VaV_a, for a∈Aa\in A, cover X. Let (φa)a∈A(\varphi_a)_{a\in A} be a continuous partition of unity subordinate to the covering (Va)a∈A(V_a)_{a\in A} (TG, IX, p. 43, prop. 1 and p. 47, th. 3). Let F denote the vector subspace of E generated by f(A)f(A). For every x∈F∩Xx\in F\cap X, put

g(x)=∑a∈Aφa(x)f(a) g(x) =\sum_{a\in A}\varphi_a(x)f(a)

This defines a continuous mapping g:F∩X→Eg: F\cap X\rightarrow E. Its image is contained in the convex envelope of ff(A), hence in F∩XF\cap X. Since the set F∩XF\cap X is a nonempty compact convex subset of a finite-dimensional vector space, the mapping gg has a fixed point b∈F∩Xb\in F\cap X by Theorem 1. We have

f(b)−b=f(b)−g(b)=∑a∈Aφa(b)(f(b)−f(a)) f(b)-b=f(b)-g(b) =\sum_{a\in A}\varphi_a(b) (f(b)-f(a))

For every a∈a\in A such that φa(b)≠0\varphi_a(b)\not = 0, one has b∈Vab\in V_a so that f(b)−f(a)∈Uf(b)-f(a)\in U. Since U is convex, it follows that f(b)−b∈Uf(b)-b\in U, which completes the proof.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.