Lemma 3
Tag 02RP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02RP].
Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 3. Endomorphismes de Fredholm et endomorphismes de Riesz
Let E be a vector space and let be an endomorphism of E which possesses an index. Suppose that the index of is zero. Let N be the nilespace of and I its conilespace.
a) The space E is then the direct sum of the subspaces N and I (Weyr-Fitting decomposition, cf. A, VIII, §2, n, p. 25).
b) The endomorphism induces, by passing to the subspaces, a nilpotent endomorphism of N and an automorphism of I.
c) Let denote the endomorphism of E which is zero on N and which coincides with on I. One has and the endomorphism is the projector with image N and kernel I.
d) Every endomorphism of E which commutes with stabilises N and I, and commutes with .
The endomorphism satisfies the properties of the preceding lemma.
Let be such that Ker() . Then Ker() Ker() for every integer ; since ind() ind() , this implies Im() Im() for , hence I = Im(). It follows from A, VIII, p. 25, prop. 2 that assertions a) and b) are satisfied.
For every , one has and , hence and . For every , one has . This implies that and that is the projector with image N and kernel I.
Let be an endomorphism of E which commutes with . Let be such that N = Ker() and I = Im(). Let ; one has , hence . Let ; there exists such that ; then, . This proves that stabilises N and I.
Let us prove finally that and are permutable. For every in N, one has . Let ; the elements and of E belong to I and their images under are both equal to , hence they are equal. By linearity, this implies that and commute.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.