Bourbaki

Proposition 10

Tag 02S0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02S0].

Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 3. Endomorphismes de Fredholm et endomorphismes de Riesz

Let E and F be locally convex spaces, p∈L(E;F)p\in \mathscr{L}(E; F) and q∈L(F;E)q\in \mathscr{L}(F; E). Put u=1E−q∘pu= 1_E-q\circ p and v=1F−p∘qv= 1_F-p\circ q.

a) Let n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}. The mapping pp defines by restriction an isomorphism of topological vector spaces of Ker(unu^n) onto Ker(vnv^n) and defines by passing to the quotients an isomorphism of topological vector spaces of Coker(unu^n) onto Coker(vnv^n);

b) If the image of uu is closed in E, that of vv is closed in F;

c) If Ker(uu) has a topological complement in E, then Ker(vv) has one in F. If Im(uu) has a topological complement in E, then Im(vv) has one in F;

d) If uu is a strict morphism, then vv is a strict morphism;

e) If uu is an automorphism of E, then vv is an automorphism of F;

f) If uu is a Fredholm endomorphism of E, then vv is a Fredholm endomorphism of F, and one has ind(uu) == ind(vv);

g) Suppose E and F separated. If uu is a Riesz endomorphism of E, then vv is a Riesz endomorphism of F.

First of all, let us note the formulas

q∘v=u∘q,v∘p=p∘u(6) q\circ v=u\circ q,v\circ p=p\circ u \tag{6}

We then prove two lemmas.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.