Bourbaki

Definition 2

Tag 02SJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02SJ].

Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 4. Perturbations dans les espaces de Banach

Let E and F be locally convex spaces, and let uu be a continuous linear mapping of E into F. One says that uu is a direct morphism if uu is a strict morphism whose kernel is a direct vector subspace of E and whose image is a direct vector subspace of F.

Let u∈L(E;F)u\in \mathscr{L}(E; F). In order that the kernel and image of uu be direct vector subspaces of E and F respectively, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist decompositions E=E1⊕E2E = E_1\oplus E_2 and F=F1⊕F2F = F_1\oplus F_2 into topological direct sums such that uu be represented by a matrix (u1000)\begin{pmatrix} u_1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} where u1∈L(E1;F1)u_1\in \mathscr{L}(E_1; F_1) is bijective. Since the kernel of uu is then E2E_2, since the canonical linear mapping of E1E_1 onto E/E2E/E_2 is an isomorphism, and since the image of uu is F1F_1, we see that uu is a strict morphism if and only if u1u_1 is an isomorphism of E1E_1 onto F1F_1. Let us denote by vv the element of L(F;E)\mathscr{L}(F; E) represented by the matrix (u1−1000)\begin{pmatrix} u_1^{-1} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} . Then the linear mapping u∘vu\circ v is the projector in F with kernel F2F_2 and image F1F_1, the linear mapping v∘uv\circ u is the projector in E with kernel E2E_2 and image E1E_1, and one has u∘v∘u=uu\circ v\circ u=u.

Conversely, one has the following result:

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.