Proposition 3
Tag 02SL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02SL].
Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 4. Perturbations dans les espaces de Banach
Let E and F be Banach spaces. The following sets are open subsets of the Banach space
a) The set of the isomorphisms of E onto F ;
b) The set of injective direct morphisms of E into F, and more precisely, for every closed vector subspace of F, the set of elements of whose image is a topological complement of ;
c) The set of surjective direct morphisms of E onto F, and more precisely, for every closed vector subspace of E, the set of elements of whose kernel is a topological complement of .
Moreover, the mapping of onto is analytic.
By definition, is the set of invertible elements of the complete normed algebra . By TG, IX, p. 40, Prop. 14, it is an open subset of . The mapping of into is analytic (LIE, III, § 1, n, Example 2).
If the set is empty, it is open. Otherwise, let be an isomorphism of E onto F. The mapping is then an isomorphism of onto which transforms into . Therefore the set is open in . Moreover, if is an element of , one has , and therefore the mapping of onto is analytic.
Let be a closed vector subspace of F. For every , let be the element of defined by . The mapping of into is continuous, and is the set of elements of such that belongs to . Since is open in by what precedes, the set is open in . The same is true of , which is the union of the when ranges over the set of closed vector subspaces of F.
Let be a closed vector subspace of E, and let be the canonical mapping of E onto the quotient Banach space . In order that an element of belong to , it is necessary and sufficient that the mapping of E into belong to . As above, it follows that is open in ; the same is true of , which is the union of the .
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.