Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 02ST, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02ST].

Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 4. Perturbations dans les espaces de Banach

Let E and F be normed spaces and u∈L(E;F)u\in \mathscr{L}(E; F). Let B denote the set of elements of E of norm <1<1. Put

P=u(E)−u(B),Q=u(E)P =u(E)-u(B),Q =u(E) - (u(B)‾∩u(E))(\overline{u(B)}\cap u(E)).

The conorm of uu is equal to the distance from 0 to P in F. If the normed space E is complete or if uu is a strict morphism, the conorm of uu is equal to the distance from 0 to Q in F.

Let N be the kernel of uu; let p:E→E/Np: E\rightarrow E/N be the canonical surjection and let v:E/N→Fv: E/N\rightarrow F be the mapping deduced from uu by passing to the quotient. The set p(B)p(B) is the set of elements of E/NE/N of norm <1<1. We have

P=u(E)−u(B)=v(E/N)−v(p(B))=v((E/N)−p(B)) P =u(E)-u(B) =v(E/N)-v(p(B)) =v((E/N)-p(B))

since the mapping vv is injective. In other words, P is made up of the elements of F of the form v(y)v(y) with y∈E/Ny\in E/N and ∥y∥⩾1\|y\|\geqslant 1. Let dPd_P denote the distance from 0 to P in F. We have

dP=d_P= infy∥∈yE∥⩾/N1∥v(y)∥=_{y\|\in yE\|\geqslant/N1}\|v(y)\|= infy∥∈yE∥=1/N∥v(y)∥=((u))_{y\|\in yE\|=1/N}\|v(y)\|= ((u)) by (6).

Suppose that uu is a strict morphism. Let ε>0\varepsilon >0. The set εu(B)\varepsilon u(B) is a neighbourhood of 0 in u(E)u(E). The closure of u(B)u(B) in u(E)u(E) is equal to u(B)‾∩u(E)\overline{u(B)}\cap u(E). It is contained in the set u(B)+εu(B)u(B) +\varepsilon u(B), which is equal to (1+ε)u(B)(1 +\varepsilon )u(B) since u(B)u(B) is convex. Hence we have (1+ε)P⊂Q⊂P(1 +\varepsilon )P\subset Q\subset P, and the distance dQd_Q from 0 to Q in F satisfies the inequalities dP⩽dQ⩽(1+ε)dPd_P\leqslant d_Q\leqslant (1 +\varepsilon )d_P. Since this holds for every ε>0\varepsilon >0, we have dQ=dP=((u))d_Q=d_P= ((u)).

Suppose that uu is not a strict morphism, but that the normed space E is complete. Then ((u))=0((u)) = 0 (remark above). The closure of u(B)u(B) in uu(E), which is equal to u(B)‾∩u\overline{u(B)}\cap u(E), is not a neighbourhood of 0 in u(E)u(E) (EVT, I, p. 17, th. 1). There then exist points of Q arbitrarily near 0, whence dQ=0=((u))d_Q= 0 = ((u)).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.