Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 02T7, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02T7].

Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 4. Perturbations dans les espaces de Banach

Let E and F be Banach spaces. In order that an element uu of L(E;F)\mathscr{L}(E; F) be a strict morphism of E into F, it is necessary and sufficient that tu^tu be a strict morphism of F′F' into E′E'. In this case, one has dim Coker(tu^tu) == dim Ker(uu) and dim Ker(tu^tu) == dim Coker(uu).

For uu to be a strict morphism, it is necessary and sufficient that tu^tu be one (EVT, IV, p. 29, cor. 3); in this case, the image of uu is closed (EVT, IV, p. 28, th. 1) and the vector space Ker(tu^tu) (resp. Coker(tu^tu)) is canonically isomorphic to the dual of the normed space Coker(uu) (resp. Ker(uu)) by EVT, IV, p. 27, prop. 2. The lemma follows.

Let E and F be Banach spaces. Denote by E(E;F)\mathscr{E}(E; F) the set of continuous linear surjective mappings from E into F and by QE(E;F)\mathscr{Q}\mathscr{E}(E; F) the set of continuous linear mappings from E into F whose image is of finite codimension. Every element of QE(E;F)\mathscr{Q}\mathscr{E}(E; F) is a strict morphism with closed image (III, p. 52, lemma 6). It follows from lemma 4 that E(E;F)\mathscr{E}(E; F) and QE(E;F)\mathscr{Q}\mathscr{E}(E; F) are the inverse images respectively of M(F′;E′)\mathscr{M}(F'; E') and QM(F′;E′)\mathscr{Q}\mathscr{M}(F'; E') under the continuous mapping u↦tuu\mapsto^tu from L(E;F)\mathscr{L}(E; F) into L(F′;E′)\mathscr{L}(F'; E').

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.