Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 02TK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02TK].

Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 5. Perturbation par une application linéaire compacte

Let E and F be topological vector spaces, uu a continuous linear mapping of E into F and U a neighbourhood of 0 in E. Suppose that uu induces a homeomorphism of U onto a closed subset of F. Then the image I of uu is closed and uu induces a homeomorphism of E onto I.

The set u(U)u(U) is a neighbourhood of 0 in I; it is closed in F, hence the subgroup I of F is locally closed at 0, and consequently it is closed (TG, III, p. 7, prop. 4).

Since Ker(uu) meets U only at 0, we have Ker(uu) ={0}=\{0\} and the mapping uu is injective. Let V be a closed neighbourhood of 0 in E contained in U. Since u(V˚)u(\mathring{V}) is a neighbourhood of 0 in uu(V), there exists a balanced neighbourhood W of 0 in F such that u(V)∩W⊂u(V˚)u(V)\cap W\subset u(\mathring{V}). The set u−1(W)\overset{-1}{u}(W) is balanced, hence connected. It contains 0 and is contained in V˚∪(E\mathring{V}\cup (E - V). Since V˚\mathring{V} and E- V are disjoint open subsets of E, the set u−1(W)\overset{-1}{u}(W) is contained in V˚\mathring{V}, whence W∩I⊂u(V˚)W\cap I\subset u(\mathring{V}). Consequently u(V˚)u(\mathring{V}) is a neighbourhood of 0 in I. This implies that uu induces a homeomorphism of E onto I.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.