Theorem 4 (Krein–Rutman)
Tag 02V4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02V4].
Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 6. Propriétés spectrales des endomorphismes des espaces de Banach
Let E be a complete normed space over . Let C be a closed total salient convex cone in E and let be a compact linear mapping such that . If the spectral radius is , then is an isolated point of the spectrum of , and there exists a nonzero eigenvector of for the eigenvalue .
Let be the complexified space of E and the endomorphism of obtained by extension of the scalars from . The spectral radius of is equal to I, p. 86); we denote it simply by . Since , the complex spectrum of is not reduced to 0. There therefore exists Sp such that (Prop. 5 of III, p. 90). Let be the spectral projector of associated with .
The resolvent is holomorphic on the complement of the spectrum of (Theorem 1 of I, p. 24). The complex number is a pole of the resolvent and its residue is the spectral projector I, p. 131).
Let and be elements of E such that is an eigenvector of for the eigenvalue . Since , there exists an element such that (Lemma 4). Since C is closed and salient, its polar is total (EVT, II, p. 48, Corollary 1), and there then exists a linear form such that .
Consider the function defined by and by
for such that Sp(). This function satisfies
for (Theorem 1 of I, p. 24, d)) and is therefore holomorphic in the disc with centre 0 and radius .
There exists a holomorphic function defined on an open neighbourhood U of and with values in such that for belonging to U, one has
(Prop. 17 of I, p. 83). For such that and , one therefore has
The term of the series corresponding to is . Since , the uniqueness of the Laurent expansion (VAR, R1, p. 30, 3.3.9) implies that cannot be prolonged to a holomorphic function in a neighbourhood of . In particular, the radius of convergence of the power series expansion (1) of the function at the point 0 is equal to .
The coefficients of the power series (1) are since and . By Lemma 3, the function cannot be extended to a holomorphic function in a neighbourhood of . The resolvent of therefore cannot be extended to a holomorphic function in a neighbourhood of , that is to say, Sp(). This implies that is an eigenvalue of (prop. 5 of III, p. 90). Since is real, it is also an eigenvalue of .
Let be the order of the pole of the resolvent of at . Let be the endomorphism
lim.
It is nonzero and commutes with , and its image is contained in the eigenspace of corresponding to cf. No. of I, p. 131). Let now be an element of and an element of C. By Theorem 1 of I, p. 24, d), one has
lim.
The bipolar theorem (EVT, II, p 48, th. 1) implies that for all . Since C is total, there exists such that (Lemma 4), and then belongs to C and is an eigenvector of for the eigenvalue , as required.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.