Lemma 6
Tag 02V9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02V9].
Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 6. Propriétés spectrales des endomorphismes des espaces de Banach
Let E be a finite-dimensional real vector space and B a compact convex neighbourhood of 0 in E. Let be an endomorphism of E such that . Then the complex spectrum of is contained in the unit disk of and, in particular, does not meet the circle with center 0 and radius 1 in .
Replacing B by , we are reduced to the case where B is balanced. The gauge of B (EVT, II, p. 28, ex. 3) is then a norm on E, which defines its topology (EVT, I, p. 14, th. 2). The hypothesis implies that for every element of E , hence that the spectral radius of is ; as this is also the spectral radius of cf. I, p. 86), the conclusion follows.
Let us now prove the proposition.
Let us denote by the order relation on E associated with the convex cone C (EVT, II, p. 13, n), that is to say, if and only if . We have if . Since is nonempty, the vector space generated by C (EVT, II, p. 12, cor. 1) contains a neighbourhood of 0, therefore the cone C is total.
Let us prove assertion a). Let . Let be an element of . We have . Let be such that the closed ball with center and radius is contained in C. For every , we have , hence for every .
Since , the hypotheses imply that . There therefore exists such that . Let us put . It is a compact endomorphism of E such that and . For every integer , we have
therefore . Since C is salient, this implies that , whence I, p. 20, prop. 1).
By the Krein-Rutman theorem (th. 4), the real number is an eigenvalue of , and there exists an eigenvector of in C for the eigenvalue . We have by hypothesis, therefore . This proves assertion a).
Let K be the intersection of the spectrum of and of the circle with center 0 and radius in . Since is compact and , the set K is finite and the image of the spectral projector is a subspace of of finite dimension (prop. 2 of III, p. 83 and prop. 5 of III, p. 90). Since K is stable under complex conjugation, the image of is a subspace of rational over (A, V, p.60, prop. 6) ; let F be the subspace of E such that is equal to the image of . The space F is stable under and contains the eigenspace of corresponding to , therefore F is nonzero.
To prove assertions b) and c), it is enough to prove that F is of dimension 1.
Let denote the endomorphism of F deduced from by passing to subspaces. Let . This is a closed salient convex cone with nonempty interior in F (since ), hence total; it satisfies , and in particular is stable under . Since and , we have . From the corollary to Theorem 4, applied to and , there exists an eigenvector of in for the eigenvalue .
The subspace Ker( ) of F is stable under . Let denote the endomorphism of Ker( ) deduced from by passing to subspaces; its spectrum is contained in the unit circle. The set B of the Ker( ) such that is a closed convex neighbourhood of 0 in Ker( ). For every and every Ker( ), we have
which belongs to if the norm of is sufficiently small, hence .
The set B is bounded: in fact, if there existed a sequence in Ker( ) such that and then, by passing to a subsequence if necessary, we should have where Ker( ) is nonzero, and lim would belong to , contrary to Lemma 5. Hence the set B is compact.
It then follows from Lemma 6, applied to Ker( ), to B and to , that the complex spectrum of does not meet the circle with center 0 and radius 1; this implies that the spectrum of is empty, which means that Ker( ) is reduced to , hence that F has dimension 1. Assertions b) and c) are thus established.
The linear mapping is compact (Corollary 1 of III, p. 9) and ; moreover (prop. 3 of I, p. 131). From the corollary to Theorem 4, there exists in an eigenvector of for the eigenvalue . The kernel of is stable under and does not meet C (Lemma 5). In particular, we have Ker( ).
Let F be a subspace of E stable under . We have the decomposition Ker( )). If F does not contain , we therefore have Ker( ), hence F does not meet C. This establishes d) and concludes the proof of the proposition.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.