Bourbaki

Lemma 6

Tag 02V9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02V9].

Théories spectrales, chapter III, § 6. Propriétés spectrales des endomorphismes des espaces de Banach

Let E be a finite-dimensional real vector space and B a compact convex neighbourhood of 0 in E. Let uu be an endomorphism of E such that u(B)⊂B˚u(B)\subset \mathring{B}. Then the complex spectrum of uu is contained in the unit disk of C\mathbf{C} and, in particular, does not meet the circle with center 0 and radius 1 in C\mathbf{C}.

Replacing B by B∩(−B)B\cap (-B), we are reduced to the case where B is balanced. The gauge pp of B (EVT, II, p. 28, ex. 3) is then a norm on E, which defines its topology (EVT, I, p. 14, th. 2). The hypothesis implies that p(u(x))<p(x)p(u(x))< p(x) for every element xx of E −{0}-\{0\}, hence that the spectral radius of uu is <1<1; as this is also the spectral radius of u(C)(u_{(\mathbf{C})}(cf. I, p. 86), the conclusion follows.

Let us now prove the proposition.

Let us denote by x≼yx\preccurlyeq y the order relation on E associated with the convex cone C (EVT, II, p. 13, no5^o5), that is to say, x≼yx\preccurlyeq y if and only if y−x∈Cy-x\in C. We have u(x)≼u(y)u(x)\preccurlyeq u(y) if x≼yx\preccurlyeq y. Since C˚\mathring{C} is nonempty, the vector space C−CC-C generated by C (EVT, II, p. 12, cor. 1) contains a neighbourhood of 0, therefore the cone C is total.

Let us prove assertion a). Let ϱ=ϱ(u)\varrho =\varrho (u). Let y0y_0 be an element of C˚\mathring{C}. We have y0≠0y_0\not = 0. Let r>0r >0 be such that the closed ball with center y0y_0 and radius rr is contained in C. For every y∈E−{0}y\in E-\{0\}, we have y0−r∥y∥−1y∈Cy_0-r\|y\|^{-1}y\in C, hence y≼r−1∥y∥y0y\preccurlyeq r^{-1}\|y\|y_0 for every y∈Ey\in E.

Since y0≠0y_0\not = 0, the hypotheses imply that u(y0)∈C˚u(y_0)\in \mathring{C}. There therefore exists t>0t >0 such that tu(y0)−y0∈Ctu(y_0)-y_0\in C. Let us put v=tuv=tu. It is a compact endomorphism of E such that v(C)⊂Cv(C)\subset C and v(y0)≽y0v(y_0)\succcurlyeq y_0. For every integer n⩾1n\geqslant 1, we have

y0≼vn(y0)≼r−1∥vn(y0)∥y0≼r−1∥vn∥∥y0∥y0 y_0\preccurlyeq v^n(y_0)\preccurlyeq r^{-1}\|v^n(y_0)\|y_0\preccurlyeq r^{-1}\|v^n\| \|y_0\|y_0

therefore (r−1∥vn∥∥y0∥−1)y0∈C(r^{-1}\|v^n\|\|y_0\| -1)y_0\in C. Since C is salient, this implies that tn∥un∥=∥vn∥⩾r/∥y0∥t^n\|u^n\|=\|v^n\|\geqslant r/\|y_0\|, whence ϱ⩾t−1>0(\varrho \geqslant t^{-1}>0 (I, p. 20, prop. 1).

By the Krein-Rutman theorem (th. 4), the real number ϱ\varrho is an eigenvalue of uu, and there exists an eigenvector x0x_0 of uu in C for the eigenvalue ϱ\varrho. We have ϱx0=u(x0)∈C˚\varrho x_0=u(x_0)\in \mathring{C} by hypothesis, therefore x0∈C˚x_0\in \mathring{C}. This proves assertion a).

Let K be the intersection of the spectrum of u(C)u_{(\mathbf{C})} and of the circle with center 0 and radius ϱ\varrho in C\mathbf{C}. Since uu is compact and ϱ>0\varrho >0, the set K is finite and the image of the spectral projector eKe_K is a subspace of E(C)E_{(\mathbf{C})} of finite dimension (prop. 2 of III, p. 83 and prop. 5 of III, p. 90). Since K is stable under complex conjugation, the image of eKe_K is a subspace of E(C)E_{(\mathbf{C})} rational over R\mathbf{R} (A, V, p.60, prop. 6) ; let F be the subspace of E such that F(C)F_{(\mathbf{C})} is equal to the image of eKe_K. The space F is stable under uu and contains the eigenspace of uu corresponding to ϱ\varrho, therefore F is nonzero.

To prove assertions b) and c), it is enough to prove that F is of dimension 1.

Let vv denote the endomorphism of F deduced from uu by passing to subspaces. Let CF=C∩FC_F= C\cap F. This is a closed salient convex cone with nonempty interior in F (since x0∈C˚∩Fx_0\in \mathring{C}\cap F), hence total; it satisfies v(CF−{0})⊂C˚Fv(C_F-\{0\})\subset \mathring{C}_F, and in particular is stable under vv. Since ϱ(v)⩽ϱ\varrho (v)\leqslant \varrho and x0∈Fx_0\in F, we have ϱ(v)=ϱ\varrho (v) =\varrho. From the corollary to Theorem 4, applied to CFC_F and vv, there exists an eigenvector ℓ\ell of tv^tv in CF∘C^{\circ}_F for the eigenvalue ϱ(v)=ϱ>0\varrho (v) =\varrho >0.

The subspace Ker(ℓ\ell ) of F is stable under vv. Let ww denote the endomorphism of Ker(ℓ\ell ) deduced from ϱ−1v\varrho^{-1}v by passing to subspaces; its spectrum is contained in the unit circle. The set B of the y∈y\in Ker(ℓ\ell ) such that x0+y∈CFx_0+y\in C_F is a closed convex neighbourhood of 0 in Ker(ℓ\ell ). For every y∈By\in B and every z∈z\in Ker(ℓ\ell ), we have

x0+(w(y)+z)=ϱ−1(v(x0+y)+ϱz) x_0+ (w(y) +z) =\varrho^{-1}(v(x_0+y) +\varrho z)

which belongs to CFC_F if the norm of zz is sufficiently small, hence w(y)∈B˚w(y)\in \mathring{B}.

The set B is bounded: in fact, if there existed a sequence (yn)n∈N(y_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} in Ker(ℓ\ell ) such that ∥yn∥→+∞\|y_n\| \rightarrow +\infty and x0+yn∈CFx_0+y_n\in C_F then, by passing to a subsequence if necessary, we should have yn/∥yn∥→yy_n/\|y_n\| \rightarrow y where y∈y\in Ker(ℓ\ell ) is nonzero, and y=y= lim ∥yn∥−1(x0+yn)\|y_n\|^{-1}(x_0+y_n) would belong to CFC_F, contrary to Lemma 5. Hence the set B is compact.

It then follows from Lemma 6, applied to Ker(ℓ\ell ), to B and to ww, that the complex spectrum of ww does not meet the circle with center 0 and radius 1; this implies that the spectrum of ww is empty, which means that Ker(ℓ\ell ) is reduced to {0}\{0\}, hence that F has dimension 1. Assertions b) and c) are thus established.

The linear mapping tu^tu is compact (Corollary 1 of III, p. 9) and tu(C∘)⊂C∘^tu(C^{\circ})\subset C^{\circ}; moreover ϱ(tu)=ϱ>0\varrho (^tu) =\varrho >0 (prop. 3 of I, p. 131). From the corollary to Theorem 4, there exists in C∘C^{\circ} an eigenvector ℓ≠0\ell \not = 0 of tu^tu for the eigenvalue ϱ\varrho. The kernel of ℓ\ell is stable under uu and does not meet C −{0}-\{0\} (Lemma 5). In particular, we have x0∉x_0\notin Ker(ℓ\ell ).

Let F be a subspace of E stable under uu. We have the decomposition F=(F∩Rx0)⊕(F∩F = (F\cap \mathbf{R}x_0)\oplus (F\cap Ker(ℓ\ell )). If F does not contain x0x_0, we therefore have F⊂F\subset Ker(ℓ\ell ), hence F does not meet C−{0}-\{0\}. This establishes d) and concludes the proof of the proposition.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.