Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 02YS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02YS].

Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 2. Endomorphismes normaux

Let gg be a continuous function from X into C\mathbf{C}. The μ\mu-essential image of gg is the closure of the image under gg of the support of μ\mu.

Let Y be the support of μ\mu. If z∈Cz\in \mathbf{C} is not adherent to gg(Y), there exists an open neighbourhood U of zz such that the open set g−1(U)\overset{-1}{g}(U) does not meet Y and is therefore locally μ\mu-negligible; this means that zz does not belong to the μ\mu-essential image of gg.

Conversely, if z∈Cz\in \mathbf{C} is adherent to gg(Y), then for every open neighbourhood U of zz, the set g−1(U)\overset{-1}{g}(U) is an open set in X which meets Y. It is therefore not μ\mu-negligible, and since it is open, it is not locally μ\mu-negligible (INT, IV, p. 172, § 5, no2^o2, Cor. 2). Hence zz belongs to the μ\mu-essential image of gg.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.