Lemma 3
Tag 02YT, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02YT].
Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 2. Endomorphismes normaux
Let be a continuous function from X into and S its -essential image. Suppose that S is not empty and that ; denote by the distance from 0 to S. Then .
Put if and otherwise. The function belongs to . Let be the class of in . Then we have the formula .
Let U be an open neighbourhood of 0 such that the open set is locally -negligible, hence negligible (INT, IV, p. 172, § 5, n, Cor. 2). Let Y be the support of ; we have - Z. The restriction of the function to X - Z is continuous and bounded; therefore and the norm of in is equal to the norm of its restriction to X - Z. Moreover, for every , the set of - Z such that is an open set in X - Z; therefore it is locally -negligible if and only if it does not meet Y (INT, IV, loc. cit. and INT, III, p. 66, § 3, n, Def. 1). Consequently, we have
sup,
whence
inf inf inf
which is equal to by the preceding lemma.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.