Let u u u be an endomorphism of the Hilbert space L 2 ( X , μ ) L^2(X, \mu) L 2 ( X , μ ) commuting with m ~ g \widetilde{m}_g m g for every function g ∈ K ( X ) g\in \mathscr{K}(X) g ∈ K ( X ) . Then there exists a unique element f ∈ L ∞ ( X , μ ) f\in L^{\infty}(X, \mu) f ∈ L ∞ ( X , μ ) such that u = m ~ f u=\widetilde{m}_f u = m f .
After Prop. 7, it is enough to prove that u u u commutes with m ~ g \widetilde{m}_g m g for every g ∈ L ∞ ( X , μ ) g\in \mathscr{L}^{\infty}(X, \mu) g ∈ L ∞ ( X , μ ) . Let h 1 h_1 h 1 and h 2 h_2 h 2 be elements of L 2 ( X , μ ) \mathscr{L}^2(X, \mu) L 2 ( X , μ ) with classes h ~ 1 \widetilde{h}_1 h 1 and h ~ 2 \widetilde{h}_2 h 2 in L 2 ( X , μ ) L^2(X, \mu) L 2 ( X , μ ) . Let k 1 k_1 k 1 (resp. k 2 k_2 k 2 ) be a function in L 2 ( X , μ ) \mathscr{L}^2(X, \mu) L 2 ( X , μ ) whose class is u ( h ~ 1 ) u(\widetilde{h}_1) u ( h 1 ) (resp. u ∗ ( h ~ 2 ) u^*(\widetilde{h}_2) u ∗ ( h 2 ) ).
Let us set h = h 1 k ‾ 2 − k 1 h ‾ 2 h=h_1\overline{k}_2-k_1\overline{h}_2 h = h 1 k 2 − k 1 h 2 ; then h ∈ L 1 ( X , μ ) h\in \mathscr{L}^1(X, \mu) h ∈ L 1 ( X , μ ) . Define the measure ν = h ⋅ μ \nu =h\cdot \mu ν = h ⋅ μ on X; it is bounded. For every g ∈ L ∞ ( X , μ ) g\in \mathscr{L}^{\infty}(X, \mu) g ∈ L ∞ ( X , μ ) , one has
⟨ h ~ 2 ∣ u ( m ~ g ( h ~ 1 ) ) − m ~ g ( u ( h ~ 1 ) ) ⟩ = ⟨ u ∗ ( h ~ 2 ) ∣ m ~ g ( h ~ 1 ) ⟩ − ⟨ h ~ 2 ∣ m ~ g ( u ( h ~ 1 ) ) ⟩
\langle \widetilde{h}_2|u(\widetilde{m}_g(\widetilde{h}_1))-\widetilde{m}_g(u(\widetilde{h}_1))\rangle =\langle u^*(\widetilde{h}_2)|\widetilde{m}_g(\widetilde{h}_1)\rangle - \langle \widetilde{h}_2|\widetilde{m}_g(u(\widetilde{h}_1))\rangle
⟨ h 2 ∣ u ( m g ( h 1 )) − m g ( u ( h 1 ))⟩ = ⟨ u ∗ ( h 2 ) ∣ m g ( h 1 )⟩ − ⟨ h 2 ∣ m g ( u ( h 1 ))⟩
= ∫ X g ⋅ h 1 ⋅ k ‾ 2 d μ − ∫ X g ⋅ k 1 ⋅ h ‾ 2 d μ = ν ( g )
=\int_Xg\cdot h_1\cdot \overline{k}_2d\mu-\int_Xg\cdot k_1\cdot \overline{h}_2d\mu=\nu (g)
= ∫ X g ⋅ h 1 ⋅ k 2 d μ − ∫ X g ⋅ k 1 ⋅ h 2 d μ = ν ( g )
Hence by hypothesis ν ( g ) = 0 \nu (g) = 0 ν ( g ) = 0 for every function g ∈ K g\in \mathscr{K} g ∈ K (X), that is, ν = 0 \nu = 0 ν = 0 . Consequently, one obtains
⟨ h ~ 2 ∣ u ( m ~ g ( h ~ 1 ) ) − m ~ g ( u ( h ~ 1 ) ) ⟩ = ν ( g ) = 0
\langle \widetilde{h}_2|u(\widetilde{m}_g(\widetilde{h}_1))-\widetilde{m}_g(u(\widetilde{h}_1))\rangle =\nu (g) = 0
⟨ h 2 ∣ u ( m g ( h 1 )) − m g ( u ( h 1 ))⟩ = ν ( g ) = 0
for every g ∈ L ∞ ( X , μ ) g\in \mathscr{L}^{\infty}(X, \mu) g ∈ L ∞ ( X , μ ) . Since this is the case for all h 1 h_1 h 1 and h 2 h_2 h 2 in L 2 ( X , μ ) \mathscr{L}^2(X, \mu) L 2 ( X , μ ) , one has u ∘ m ~ g = m ~ g ∘ u u\circ \widetilde{m}_g=\widetilde{m}_g\circ u u ∘ m g = m g ∘ u .
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.