Bourbaki

Proposition 14

Tag 0317, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0317].

Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 3. Distributions et distributions tempérées

Let f∈C∞(Rn)f\in \mathscr{C}^{\infty}(\mathbf{R}^n). Suppose that for every α\alpha in Nn\mathbf{N}^n, the function ∂αf\partial^{\alpha}f has polynomial growth. The linear mapping of the space S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n) into itself defined by φ↦fφ\varphi \mapsto f \varphi is continuous.

For every φ\varphi in S(Rn)\mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n), the function fφf \varphi belongs to C∞(Rn)\mathscr{C}^{\infty}(\mathbf{R}^n). By hypothesis, for every α∈Nn\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n, there exist an integer kα⩾0k_{\alpha}\geqslant 0 and a real CαC_{\alpha} such that ∣∂αf(x)∣⩽Cα(1+∥x∥)kα|\partial^{\alpha}f(x)|\leqslant C_{\alpha}(1 +\|x\|)^{k_{\alpha}} for every xx in Rn\mathbf{R}^n. Let φ∈S(Rn)\varphi \in \mathscr{S}(\mathbf{R}^n). Let α∈Nn\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n and k∈Nk\in \mathbf{N}. By Prop. 1 of IV, p. 196, there follows

(α)kβα−β (\alpha )k\beta \alpha -\beta

q~α,k(fφ)⩽∑\widetilde{q}_{\alpha ,k}(f \varphi )\leqslant \sum sup ∥x∥∣∂f(x)∂φ(x)∣\|x\||\partial f(x)\partial \varphi (x)|

βx∈Rn \beta_{x\in\mathbf{R}^n}
0⩽β⩽α0\leqslant \beta \leqslant \alpha
(α)kkα−β (\alpha )kk\alpha -\beta

⩽∑Cβ\leqslant \sum C_{\beta} sup ∥x∥(1+∥x∥)β∣∂φ(x)∣\|x\|(1 +\|x\|)^{^{\beta}}|\partial \varphi (x)|.

βx∈Rn \beta_{x\in\mathbf{R}^n}
0⩽β⩽α0\leqslant \beta \leqslant \alpha

Let β∈Nn\beta \in \mathbf{N}^n be such that 0⩽β⩽α0\leqslant \beta \leqslant \alpha. For every x∈Rnx\in \mathbf{R}^n, one has

∥x∥k(1+∥x∥)kβ∣∂α−βφ(x)∣⩽\|x\|^k(1 +\|x\|)^{k_{\beta}}|\partial^{\alpha-\beta}\varphi (x)|\leqslant sup∥x∥⩽12kβ∣∂α−βφ(x)∣_{\|x\|\leqslant 1}2^{k_{\beta}}|\partial^{\alpha-\beta}\varphi (x)|

+ supx∈Rn2kβ∥x∥k+kβ∣∂α−βφ(x)∣_{x\in\mathbf{R}^n}2^{k_{\beta}}\|x\|^{k+k_{\beta}}|\partial^{\alpha-\beta}\varphi (x)| whence finally

(α)k() (\alpha )_k()
q~α,k(fφ)⩽∑2βCβq~α−β,0(φ)+q~α−β,k+kβ(φ) \widetilde{q}_{\alpha ,k}(f \varphi )\leqslant \sum 2^{^{\beta}}C_{\beta}\widetilde{q}_{\alpha-\beta ,0}(\varphi ) +\widetilde{q}_{\alpha-\beta ,k+k_{\beta}}(\varphi )
β \beta
0⩽β⩽α0\leqslant \beta \leqslant \alpha

which implies the proposition.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.