Definition 1
Tag 032J, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 032J].
Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 4. Opérateurs partiels
Let E and F be vector spaces over K. A partial operator from E into F is a correspondence between E and F satisfying the following conditions:
(i) The graph Γ is a vector subspace of ;
(ii) The graph Γ is functional.
If E = F, one says that is a partial operator on E.
Let be a partial operator from E into F. The graph Γ of the correspondence is called the graph of the partial operator , and is also denoted by . We denote by the set of partial operators from E into F; we write simply .
To give a partial operator from E into F amounts to giving a vector subspace D of E and a linear mapping from D into F, the associated partial operator being the correspondence where is the graph of .
The domain of definition of a partial operator is called simply the domain of , and denoted by dom().
Every linear mapping from E into F is a partial operator from E into F.
If is a vector subspace, we shall denote by the partial operator with domain D which is the identity mapping on D, that is, the correspondence where is the diagonal of (E, II, p. 13, def. 8). We shall denote by the partial operator with domain D which is zero on D, that is, the correspondence .
Two partial operators and from E into F are equal if and only if dom() dom() and if the linear mappings and from dom() into F coincide.
Following E, II, §3, the following notions are defined:
(i) Let be a partial operator from E into F; let D be its domain and the associated linear mapping. The image of a subset A of E by is the subset of F; it is denoted simply by . The inverse image by of a subset B of F by is the subset of D.
If A (resp. B) is a vector subspace of E (resp. of F), then its image by (resp. its inverse image) is a vector subspace of F (resp. of E).
The image of is the vector subspace of F, also denoted by Im(). One says that is a surjective partial operator if Im() . The kernel of is the vector subspace of E, also denoted by Ker(). The kernel of is reduced to 0 if and only if the linear mapping from dom() into F is injective. One then says that is injective. If is injective and surjective, one says that it is bijective.
(ii) If E, F and G are K-vector spaces and , are partial operators from E into F and from F into G, respectively, the composite correspondence is a partial operator from E into G. Its domain is (dom()). If H is a K-vector space and a partial operator from G into H, one has . One will sometimes write instead of .
(iii) In particular, for every partial operator from E into F and every , the partial operators and are defined. They are equal if , or if the domain of is equal to E; one has and .
Let E be a vector space. From what precedes, the set (E), endowed with the law of composition defined by , is a unital associative magma (A, I, p. 4, Def. 5 and A, I, p. 12, Def. 2) with identity element . For every , one denotes by the composite (A, I, p. 13).
Moreover, one defines the following notions:
(i) If is a partial operator from E into F, and if G is a subspace of E, the reduction of to G is the partial operator from E into F. Its domain is dom(); one will sometimes denote it by , when no confusion with the restriction of to the subspace G is to be feared.
(ii) Let be an injective partial operator from F into E. Then the inverse correspondence of is a partial operator such that dom() Im(). One says that is the inverse partial operator of . One has the equalities in and in . The partial operator is injective and one has .
(iii) Let E, F and G be vector spaces. Let (resp. ) be an injective partial operator from E into F (resp. from F into G). Then the partial operator is injective and .
(iv) If and are partial operators from E into F, one says that is an extension of , and one writes , if the graph of is contained in the graph of . This implies that dom() dom() and that is the restriction of to dom(). The relation “ ” is an order relation in . For example, one has for every and every .
(v) Let E be a vector space over K and a family of vector spaces over K. For , let be a partial operator from E into . The product partial operator of the is the partial operator from E into the product vector space of the spaces whose domain is the intersection D of the spaces dom() and which associates to the family . It is denoted by .
(vi) Let be the linear mapping . Let and be partial operators from E into F. The sum is the partial operator from E into F. Its domain is dom() dom(). For in , one has .
Let G be a vector space over K. For every and in and every , one has . In general, there is no equality in this formula (exercise 1 of IV, p. 344), but this is the case when the domain of is equal to F. For , one has .
(vii) Let L be an extension of the field K. Let E and F be vector spaces over K and the L-vector spaces obtained by extension of scalars from K to L (A, II, p. 82). For every partial operator from E into F, let denote the partial operator from into whose graph is the vector subspace of ; its domain is dom(), and it coincides on this with the unique linear mapping sending to for every dom().
Let be a partial operator from E into F. One has if and only if .
(viii) Let be K-vector spaces. Let (resp. ) be a partial operator from into (resp. from into ). Let denote the partial operator from into with domain dom()dom() such that for every .
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.