Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 032X, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 032X].

Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 4. Opérateurs partiels

The multiplication operator m~g\widetilde{m}_g from LKp1(X,μ)L^{p_1}_K(X, \mu) into LKp2(X,μ)L^{p_2}_K(X, \mu) is a closed operator with dense domain.

Let us first prove that the partial operator m~g\widetilde{m}_g is closed. Let (fn,hn)n∈N(f_n, h_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} be a sequence in LKp1(X,μ)×LKp2(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_K^{p_1}(X, \mu)\times \mathscr{L}_K^{p_2}(X, \mu) such that the sequence (fn~,h~n)(f_{\widetilde{n}},\widetilde{h}_n) of the classes of fnf_n and hnh_n belongs to the graph of m~g\widetilde{m}_g and converges in LKp1(X,μ)×LKp2(X,μ)L^{p_1}_K(X, \mu)\times L^{p_2}_K(X, \mu) when nn tends to infinity. Let (f,h)(f, h) be a pair in LKp1(X,μ)×LKp2(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_K^{p_1}(X, \mu)\times \mathscr{L}_K^{p_2}(X, \mu) such that the pair (f~,h~)(\widetilde{f} ,\widetilde{h}) of their classes is the limit of (f~n,h~n)(\widetilde{f}_n,\widetilde{h}_n).

There exists a sequence (fnk)k∈N(f_{n_k})_{k\in\mathbf{N}} extracted from the sequence (fn)n(f_n)_n such that fnk(x)f_{n_k}(x) converges to f(x)f(x) for μ\mu-almost every xx (INT, IV, p. 131, § 3, no4^o4, th. 3). This implies that hnk(x)=g(x)fnk(x)h_{n_k}(x) =g(x)f_{n_k}(x) converges μ\mu-almost everywhere to g(x)f(x)g(x)f(x). Moreover the sequence (hnk)(h_{n_k}) converges to hh in the space LKp2(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_K^{p_2}(X, \mu). The functions hh and gfgf are therefore equal μ\mu-almost everywhere (loc. cit.). Thus f~\widetilde{f} belong to the domain of m~g\widetilde{m}_g and h~=m~g(f~)\widetilde{h}=\widetilde{m}_g(\widetilde{f}). This proves that m~g\widetilde{m}_g is closed.

Let us prove that the domain of m~g\widetilde{m}_g is dense in LKp1(X,μ)L^{p_1}_K(X, \mu). It is enough to verify that the classes of functions f∈K(X;K)f\in \mathscr{K}(X; K) belong to the closure of the domain of m~g\widetilde{m}_g in LKp1(X,μ)L^{p_1}_K(X, \mu). Let f∈K(X;K)f\in \mathscr{K}(X; K) and let f~\widetilde{f} be its class in LKp1(X,μ)L^{p_1}_K(X, \mu). For every integer n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}, let φn\varphi_n denote the characteristic function of the set of elements x∈Xx\in X such that ∣g(x)∣⩽n|g(x)|\leqslant n, and put fn=fφnf_n=f \varphi_n. Then ∣gfn∣⩽n∣f∣|gf_n|\leqslant n|f|, which belong to LKp2(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_K^{p_2}(X, \mu), hence fnf_n belong to the domain of m~g\widetilde{m}_g. For every element xx of X, the sequence (fn(x))n∈N(f_n(x))_{n\in\mathbf{N}} converges to f(x)f(x) when n→+∞n\rightarrow +\infty; moreover, one has ∣fn∣⩽∣f∣|f_n|\leqslant |f|, which belong to LKp1(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_K^{p_1}(X, \mu). By Lebesgue's theorem (INT, IV, p. 137, § 3, no7^o7, th. 6), the sequence of classes of fnf_n converges to f~\widetilde{f} in LKp1(X,μ)L^{p_1}_K(X, \mu). Thus, the class of ff belong to the closure of the domain of m~g\widetilde{m}_g.

In the following proposition, it is supposed that p1=p2=2p_1=p_2= 2.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.