Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 032Y, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 032Y].

Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 4. Opérateurs partiels

a) Let g′g' be a μ\mu-measurable function on X such that ∣g∣⩽∣g′∣|g|\leqslant |g'|. One has dom(m~g′\widetilde{m}_{g'})⊂\subset dom(m~g\widetilde{m}_g) and dom(m~g′\widetilde{m}_{g'}) is a core of the partial operator m~g\widetilde{m}_g;

b) Let F be a subspace of LK2(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_K^2(X, \mu) whose intersection with K(X;K)\mathscr{K}(X; K) is dense in K(X;K)\mathscr{K}(X; K) and whose image G in LK2(X,μ)L^2_K(X, \mu) is contained in dom(m~g\widetilde{m}_g). If ∣g∣2|g|^2 is locally μ\mu-integrable, then K(X;K)\mathscr{K}(X; K) is contained in the domain of m~g\widetilde{m}_g and G is a core of mgm_g.

Let us prove a). If f∈LK2(X,μ)f\in \mathscr{L}_K^2(X, \mu) belong to the domain of mg′m_{g'}, so that fg′∈LK2(X,μ)f g'\in \mathscr{L}_K^2(X, \mu), the assumption implies that fg∈LK2(X,μ)f g\in \mathscr{L}_K^2(X, \mu), whence the result.

Let us prove that dom(m~g′\widetilde{m}_{g'}) is a core of m~g\widetilde{m}_g, that is to say that the domain of m~g′\widetilde{m}_{g'} is dense in the Hilbert space Em~gE_{\widetilde{m}_g}. Let h∈LK2(X,μ)h\in \mathscr{L}_K^2(X, \mu)

whose class h~\widetilde{h} belong to Em~gE_{\widetilde{m}_g} and is orthogonal to dom(m~g′\widetilde{m}_{g'}). This means that

(h~∣h~′)m~g=∫Xhh′(1+∣g∣2)dμ=0 (\widetilde{h}|\widetilde{h}')_{\widetilde{m}_g}=\int_Xh h'(1 +|g|^2)d\mu= 0

for every function h′∈LK2(X,μ)h'\in \mathscr{L}_K^2(X, \mu) whose class h~′\widetilde{h}' belongs to dom(m~g′\widetilde{m}_{g'}).

Let C be a compact subset of X and let φ\varphi be its characteristic function. Let n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}. Denote by φn\varphi_n the characteristic function of the μ\mu-integrable set CnC_n of the x∈Cx\in C such that ∣h(x)∣⩽n|h(x)|\leqslant n and put hn′=φnhh'_n=\varphi_nh. The class of hn′h'_n belongs to the domain of m~g′\widetilde{m}_{g'} since ∣g′hn′∣⩽nφ|g'h'_n|\leqslant n\varphi; hence

0=∫Xh‾hn′(1+∣g∣2)dμ=∫X∣h∣2φn(1+∣g∣2)dμ 0 =\int_X\overline{h}h'_n(1 +|g|^2)d\mu=\int_X|h|^2\varphi_n(1 +|g|^2)d\mu

This implies that hh is zero for μ\mu-almost every x∈Cnx\in C_n and therefore, since nn is arbitrary, that hh is zero for μ\mu-almost every x∈Cx\in C. It follows finally that hh is zero μ\mu-almost everywhere, since C is arbitrary and hh is moderate (INT, V, p. 9, § 1, no3^o3, cor.).

Let us now consider assertion b). Since ∣g∣2|g|^2 is locally μ\mu-integrable, the function fgf g belongs to LK2(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_K^2(X, \mu) if f∈K(X;K)f\in \mathscr{K}(X; K), hence K(X;K)\mathscr{K}(X; K) is contained in the domain of m~g\widetilde{m}_g.

Let h∈LK2(X,μ)h\in \mathscr{L}_K^2(X, \mu) whose class h~\widetilde{h} belongs to EmgE_{m_g} and is orthogonal to G. One then has

0=(h~∣h~′)m~g=∫Xhh‾′(1+∣g∣2)dμ 0 = (\widetilde{h}|\widetilde{h}')_{\widetilde{m}_g}=\int_Xh\overline{h}'(1 +|g|^2)d\mu

for every h′∈Fh'\in F of class h~′\widetilde{h}'. In view of the assumption on F, this means that the measure h(1+∣g∣2)⋅μh(1 +|g|^2)\cdot \mu is zero, hence that hh is zero μ\mu-almost everywhere since hh is moderate.

Let pp be a real number ⩾1\geqslant 1. Let hh be an element of LK∞(X,μ)\mathscr{L}_K^{\infty}(X, \mu). The multiplication operator m~h\widetilde{m}_h by hh is an endomorphism of LKp(X,μ)L^p_K(X, \mu)(IV, p. 186, No.o5^o5). Suppose that the set Y of the x∈Xx\in X such that h(x)=0h(x) = 0 is locally μ\mu-negligible. Then the endomorphism m~h\widetilde{m}_h is injective (Lemma 7 of IV, p. 186). Let us denote by h−1h^{-1} the function on X equal to 0 on Y and to x↦1/h(x)x\mapsto 1/h(x) on X- Y. The reciprocal partial operator m~h−1\widetilde{m}^{-1}_h is the multiplication operator by h−1h^{-1} from LKp(X,μ)L^p_K(X, \mu) into LKp(X,μ)L^p_K(X, \mu), that is to say, m~h−1=m~h−1\widetilde{m}^{-1}_h=\widetilde{m}_{h^{-1}}. In fact, the image of m~h\widetilde{m}_h is the space of classes of functions g∈LKp(X,μ)g\in \mathscr{L}_K^p(X, \mu) of the form g=hfg=hf for f∈LKp(X,μ)f\in \mathscr{L}_K^p(X, \mu). This condition is equivalent to g(x)/h(x)=f(x)g(x)/h(x) =f(x) for every x∈Xx\in X- Y and g(x)=0g(x) = 0 if x∈Yx\in Y. This implies that the domain of m~h−1\widetilde{m}^{-1}_h in LKp(X,μ)L^p_K(X, \mu) is the domain of m~h−1\widetilde{m}_{h^{-1}}, and that the equality m~h−1=m~h−1\widetilde{m}^{-1}_h=\widetilde{m}_{h^{-1}} is valid.

In what follows, we shall sometimes denote simply by mhm_h the partial multiplication operator by hh from LKp1(X,μ)L^{p^1}_K(X, \mu) into LKp2(X,μ)L^{p_2}_K(X, \mu).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.