Bourbaki

Proposition 12

Tag 033L, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 033L].

Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 4. Opérateurs partiels

Let uu be a closed operator with dense domain from E into F. The partial operator u∗∘uu^*\circ u on E is self-adjoint and positive. Its domain is a core for uu.

Let us denote by vv the partial operator 1E+u∗∘u1_E+u^*\circ u. Its domain is dom(u∗∘uu^*\circ u), which is contained in dom(uu). For all x∈x\in dom(uu) and y∈y\in dom(vv), one has u(y)∈u(y)\in dom(u∗u^*) and

⟨x∣v(y)⟩=⟨x∣y⟩+⟨x∣(u∗∘u)(y)⟩=⟨x∣y⟩+⟨u(x)∣u(y)⟩(3) \langle x|v(y)\rangle =\langle x|y\rangle +\langle x|(u^*\circ u)(y)\rangle =\langle x|y\rangle +\langle u(x)|u(y)\rangle \tag{3}
⟨y∣v(y)⟩=∥y∥2+∥u(y)∥2(4) \langle y|v(y)\rangle =\|y\|^2+\|u(y)\|^2 \tag{4}

Formula (4) implies that the partial operator vv is injective. Moreover, by prop. 7 of IV, p. 236, a), one has F⊕E=Γu∗⊕s(Γu)F\oplus E = \Gamma_{u^*}\oplus s(\Gamma_u). Let x∈Ex\in E. There exist y′∈y'\in dom(u∗u^*) and x′∈x'\in dom(uu) such that

(0,x)=(y′,u∗(y′))+(−u(x′),x′)=(y′−u(x′),x′+u∗(y′)) (0, x) = (y', u^*(y')) + (-u(x'), x') = (y'-u(x'), x'+u^*(y'))

Hence one has y′=u(x′)y'=u(x'), whence x′∈x'\in dom(u∗∘uu^*\circ u) == dom(vv) and

x=x′+u∗(y′)=x′+(u∗∘u)(x′)=v(x′) x=x'+u^*(y') =x'+ (u^*\circ u)(x') =v(x')

The partial operator vv on E is therefore surjective, and induces a bijective linear mapping of dom(vv) onto E.

Let x∈Ex\in E be orthogonal to dom(vv). Write x=v(x′)x=v(x') where x′∈x'\in dom(vv). By formula (4), one obtains

0=⟨x′∣x⟩=⟨x′∣v(x′)⟩=∥x′∥2+∥u(x′)∥2 0 =\langle x'|x\rangle =\langle x'|v(x')\rangle =\|x'\|^2+\|u(x')\|^2

whence x′=0x'= 0, and then x=0x= 0. The domain of vv is therefore dense in E.

The partial operator vv has dense domain; it is bijective and formula (3) shows that it is symmetric. One concludes that vv is self-adjoint by applying the corollary to proposition 10. Consequently, u∗∘u=v−1Eu^*\circ u=v-1_E is self-adjoint. Moreover, the formula

⟨x∣(u∗∘u)(x)⟩=∥u(x)∥2 \langle x|(u^*\circ u)(x)\rangle =\|u(x)\|^2

for all x∈x\in dom(u∗∘uu^*\circ u) implies that u∗∘uu^*\circ u is positive.

Finally, let y∈Euy\in E_u be orthogonal to dom(u∗∘uu^*\circ u). There exists an element xx in the domain of u∗∘uu^*\circ u such that y=v(x)=x+(u∗∘u)(x)y=v(x) =x+ (u^*\circ u)(x). One then has 0=(x∣y)u=⟨y∣y⟩0 = (x|y)_u=\langle y|y\rangle, whence y=0y= 0.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person.