We have b(u)∗=b(u∗).
Let q1 and q2 be the projections Γu∗→E and let (k,∣q1∗∣) be the polar decomposition of q1∗, so that b(u∗)=q2∘k. For all x and y in E, we have j(x)∈Γu and k(y)∈Γu∗, and since Γu is orthogonal to s(Γu∗) by prop. 7 of IV, p. 236, it follows that
0=⟨j(x)∣s(k(y))⟩=⟨p1∘j(x)∣−q2∘k(y)⟩+⟨p2∘j(x)∣q1∘k(y)⟩
Since p1∘j=∣p1∗∣ and q1∘k=∣q1∗∣ (prop. 11, b) of I, p. 140) we obtain
⟨b(u)x∣∣q1∗∣y⟩=⟨∣p1∗∣x∣b(u∗)y⟩
hence ∣q1∗∣b(u)=b(u∗)∗∣p1∗∣. Using formulas (1) and (4), we conclude that b(u)∣p1∗∣=∣q1∗∣b(u)=b(u∗)∗∣p1∗∣, and since the image of ∣p1∗∣ is the domain of u, which is dense in E, we deduce b(u)=b(u∗)∗.
We denote by Ω(E) the set of v∈L(E) such that 1E−v∗v is positive and injective. For v∈Ω(E), the hermitian endomorphism (1E−v∗v)1/2 is injective, since its square is so, and we denote by B(v) the partial operator v∘((1E−v∗v)1/2)−1.
Note that 1E−v∗v is positive if and only if ∥v∥⩽1, since one has ⟨x∣(1E−v∗v)(x)⟩=∥x∥2−∥v(x)∥2 for every x∈E.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.