Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 0363, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0363].

Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 5. Opérateurs partiels normaux et théorème spectral

Let A be a closed subset of Sp(uu). Let φA\varphi_A be the characteristic function of A and pA=φA(u)p_A=\varphi_A(u) the spectral projector of uu defined by A. Let us denote by EAE_A the image of pAp_A. It is a closed subspace of E.

a) The subspace EAE_A is the space of the x∈Ex\in E such that the support of the spectral measure of xx relative to uu is contained in A;

b) If A is bounded in C\mathbf{C}, then EAE_A is contained in the domain of uu;

c) For every xx belonging to the domain of uu, one has pA(x)∈p_A(x)\in dom(uu) and u(pA(x))∈EAu(p_A(x))\in E_A, in particular u(x)∈EAu(x)\in E_A if x∈x\in dom(uu)∩EA\cap E_A.

For xx in E, one denotes by μx\mu_x the spectral measure of xx relative to uu.

Let us prove a). Let xx be an element of EAE_A. Let z∈C−z\in \mathbf{C}- A and U a relatively compact open neighbourhood of zz which does not meet A. For every function f∈K(C)f\in \mathscr{K}(\mathbf{C}) with support contained in U, one has

∫fμx=⟨x∣f(u)x⟩=⟨pA(x)∣f(u)x⟩=∫fμx=0 \int f \mu_x=\langle x|f(u)x\rangle =\langle p_A(x)|f(u)x\rangle =\int f \mu_x= 0

Sp(uu) Sp(uu)∩A\cap A according to formula (10). This means that zz does not belong to the support of μx\mu_x. Consequently, the support of μx\mu_x is contained in A.

Conversely, let x∈Ex\in E be such that the support of μx\mu_x is contained in A. We have

⟨x∣pA(x)⟩=∫μx=∫μx=⟨x∣x⟩ \langle x|p_A(x)\rangle =\int\mu_x=\int\mu_x=\langle x|x\rangle

Sp(uu)∩A\cap A Sp(uu)

(loc. cit.) therefore ∥pA(x)−x∥2=∥pA(x)∥2−∥x∥2⩽0\|p_A(x)-x\|^2=\|p_A(x)\|^2- \|x\|^2\leqslant 0 and consequently pA(x)=xp_A(x) =x, that is to say x∈EAx\in E_A.

Assertion b) follows from a) and from the remark in IV, p. 273.

Let us prove c). The domain of uu is the set of x∈Ex\in E such that the identity function of Sp(uu) belongs to L2\mathscr{L}^2(Sp(uu),μx, \mu_x) ((loc. cit.). Since μpA(x)=φA⋅μx\mu_{p_A(x)}=\varphi_A\cdot \mu_x for x∈Ex\in E (cor. of Prop. 5 of IV, p. 275), one has pA(x)∈p_A(x)\in dom(uu) if x∈x\in dom(uu).

Let x∈x\in dom(uu) and y=pA(x)y=p_A(x); one has y∈y\in dom(uu)∩EA\cap E_A according to c). The spectral measure of u(y)u(y) relative to uu is ∣|IdSp(u)∣2⋅μy(_{Sp(u)}|^2\cdot \mu_y(loc. cit.). Since μy\mu_y has support in A, the same is true of μu(y)\mu_{u(y)}, hence u(y)∈EAu(y)\in E_A according to a).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.