Bourbaki

Example 2

Tag 036E, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 036E].

Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 5. Opérateurs partiels normaux et théorème spectral

Let Tb\mathscr{T}_b be the Banach-space topology of L(E)\mathscr{L}(E). For the Tb\mathscr{T}_b-resolvent topology, every u∈A(E)u\in \mathscr{A}(E) admits a countable fundamental system of neighbourhoods.

In fact, it is enough to prove that for every λ∈\lambda \in C-R and every ε>0\varepsilon >0, there exist λ′∈Q+iQ∗\lambda '\in \mathbf{Q}+i\mathbf{Q}^* and an integer n⩾1n\geqslant 1 such that every partial operator v∈A(E)v\in \mathscr{A}(E) satisfying ∥R(v,λ′)−R(u,λ′)∥<1/n\|R(v, \lambda ')-R(u, \lambda ')\|<1/n also satisfies the condition ∥R(v,λ)−R(u,λ)∥<ε\|R(v, \lambda )-R(u, \lambda )\|< \varepsilon; writing

∥R(v,λ)−R(u,λ)∥⩽∥R(v,λ)−R(v,λ′)∥ \|R(v, \lambda )-R(u, \lambda )\|\leqslant \|R(v, \lambda )-R(v, \lambda ')\|
+∥R(v,λ′)−R(u,λ′)∥+∥R(u,λ′)−R(u,λ)∥ +\|R(v, \lambda ')-R(u, \lambda ')\|+\|R(u, \lambda ')-R(u, \lambda )\|

this property follows from formula (8) of IV, p. 245, from the estimates of proposition 17 of IV, p. 248, and from the fact that Q+iQ∗\mathbf{Q}+i\mathbf{Q}^* is everywhere dense in C−R\mathbf{C}-\mathbf{R}.

The conclusion of the proposition is not valid in general if C0(R)\mathscr{C}_0(\mathbf{R}) is replaced by Cb(R)\mathscr{C}_b(\mathbf{R}) (exercise 29 of IV, p. 366, e)). Nevertheless, one has the following result.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.