Bourbaki

Proposition 18

Tag 0371, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0371].

Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 5. Opérateurs partiels normaux et théorème spectral

Let uu be a self-adjoint partial operator on E and λ\lambda a real number. Then λ∈\lambda \in Spe(u)_e(u) if and only if there exists an orthonormal sequence (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} in E such that u(xn)−λxnu(x_n)-\lambda x_n tends to 0 in E.

Suppose first that λ∈\lambda \in Spe(u)_e(u). If the spectral projector of uu relative to {λ}\{\lambda \} is of infinite rank, any orthonormal sequence (xn)(x_n) in its image answers the question (cf. cor. to prop. 9 of IV, p. 278). We shall suppose in the sequel that this is not the case.

For each k∈Nk\in \mathbf{N}, let JkJ_k be the set of t∈[λ−1,λ+1]t\in [\lambda -1, \lambda + 1] such that

1k+2<∣t−λ∣⩽1k+1 \frac{1}{k + 2}<|t-\lambda |\leqslant \frac{1}{k + 1}

The sets JkJ_k are pairwise disjoint. Moreover, for every integer K∈NK\in \mathbf{N}, the sets (Jk)k⩾K(J_k)_{k\geqslant K} form a partition of the set

IK=[λ−1/(K+1),λ+1/(K+1)]−{0} I_K= [\lambda -1/(K + 1), \lambda + 1/(K + 1)]-\{0\}

Since the spectral projector of uu relative to IK∪{0}I_K\cup \{0\} is of infinite rank (lemma 9 of IV, p. 297) and that relative to {λ}\{\lambda \} is supposed to be of finite rank, one deduces from prop. 8 of IV, p. 278 that there exists a strictly increasing sequence (kn)n∈N(k_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} in N\mathbf{N} such that the spectral projector pnp_n of uu relative to JknJ_{k_n} is nonzero. Let xnx_n be a vector of norm 1 in the image of pnp_n. The sequence (xn)(x_n) is orthonormal, since the image of pnp_n is orthogonal to that of pmp_m for all n≠mn\not =m in N\mathbf{N}.

Let n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}. Let μn\mu_n denote the spectral measure of xnx_n relative to uu; its support is contained in JknJ_{k_n} (prop. 9 of IV, p. 278). It follows that

∥u(xn)−λxn∥2=∫∣t−λ∣2dμn(t)⩽12 \|u(x_n)-\lambda x_n\|^2=\int|t-\lambda |^2d\mu_n(t)\leqslant 1_2
Ckn _{\mathbf{C}}k_n

therefore the sequence (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} has the required property.

Conversely, suppose that there exists an orthonormal sequence (xn)n∈N(x_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} in E such that u(xn)−λxn→u(x_n)-\lambda x_n\rightarrow 0. Let μn\mu_n denote the spectral measure of xnx_n relative to uu.

Let ε>0\varepsilon >0. Let pεp_{\varepsilon} denote the spectral projector of uu relative to the open interval Iε=]λ−ε,λ+ε[I_{\varepsilon}= ]\lambda -\varepsilon , \lambda +\varepsilon [. For every n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}, we have

1=∥xn∥2=μn(Iε)+μn(R−Iε) 1 =\|x_n\|^2=\mu_n(I_{\varepsilon}) +\mu_n(\mathbf{R}-I_{\varepsilon})
⩽μn(Iε)+12∫∣t−λ∣2dμn(t) \leqslant \mu_n(I_{\varepsilon}) +1_2\int|t-\lambda |^2d\mu_n(t)
εR−Iε \varepsilon_{\mathbf{R}-I_{\varepsilon}}
=∥pε(xn)∥2+1ε2∥u(xn)−λxn∥2 =\|p_{\varepsilon}(x_n)\|^2+\frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}\|u(x_n)-\lambda x_n\|^2

The assumption on the sequence (xn)(x_n) therefore implies that the norm of pε(xn)p_{\varepsilon}(x_n) cannot tend to 0. Since the orthonormal sequence (xn)(x_n) converges weakly to 0 in E (Lemma 13), the projector pεp_{\varepsilon} cannot be compact (Cor. of Prop. 6 of III, p. 6) and is consequently of infinite rank. Since this holds for every ε>0\varepsilon >0, Lemma 9 of IV, p. 297 allows us to conclude that λ∈\lambda \in Spe(u)_e(u).

The following theorem is the analogue for self-adjoint partial operators of Theorem 3 of III, p. 93.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.