Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 03A4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03A4].

Théories spectrales, chapter V, § 2. Représentations des groupes localement compacts

Let H be a locally compact group. Let ϱ1\varrho_1 (resp. ϱ2\varrho_2) be a continuous representation of G (resp. of H) in a separated locally convex K-vector space E1E_1 (resp. E2E_2). Let F denote the space L(E1;E2)\mathscr{L}(E_1; E_2) endowed with the topology of compact convergence. The representation ϱ\varrho of G×HG\times H in F defined by ϱ(g,h)u=ϱ2(h)∘u∘ϱ1(g−1)\varrho (g, h)u=\varrho_2(h)\circ u\circ \varrho_1(g^{-1}) for (g,h)∈G×H(g, h)\in G\times H is continuous.

Let Lc(E1;E2)\mathscr{L}_c(E_1; E_2) denote the space L(E1;E2)\mathscr{L}(E_1; E_2) endowed with the topology of compact convergence. Let F1\mathfrak{F}_1 (resp. F2,F3\mathfrak{F}_2,\mathfrak{F}_3) be a filter in G converging to ee (resp. a filter in Lc(E1;E2)\mathscr{L}_c(E_1; E_2) converging to 0, a filter in H converging to ee). Since G and H are locally compact, there exist elements C∈F1C\in \mathfrak{F}_1 and D∈F3D\in \mathfrak{F}_3 which are relatively compact. The set ϱ1(C−1)\varrho_1(C^{-1}) is equicontinuous in L(E1)(\mathscr{L}(E_1) (cf. INT, VIII, p. 129, § 2, no1^o1, rem. 2, a′))')). By prop. 9 of EVT, III, p. 33 and prop. 4 of EVT, III, p. 31, the mapping defined by (u,v)↦u∘v(u, v)\mapsto u\circ v of Lc(E1;E2)×ϱ1(C−1)\mathscr{L}_c(E_1; E_2)\times \varrho_1(C^{-1}) into Lc(E1;E2)\mathscr{L}_c(E_1; E_2) is continuous. The filter base F2∘ϱ1(F1−1)\mathfrak{F}_2\circ \varrho_1(\mathfrak{F}^{-1}_1) therefore converges to 0 in Lc(E1;E2)\mathscr{L}_c(E_1; E_2). The set ϱ2(D)\varrho_2(D) is equicontinuous in L(E2)(\mathscr{L}(E_2) (cf. INT, VIII, p. 129, § 2, no1^o1, rem. 2), and for every x∈E2x\in E_2, the set ϱ2(D)x⊂E2\varrho_2(D)x\subset E_2 is relatively compact. Consequently, ϱ2(D)\varrho_2(D) is relatively compact in L(E2)\mathscr{L}(E_2) endowed with the topology of compact convergence (TG, X, p. 18, cor. 1). The mapping defined by (u,v)↦u∘v(u, v)\mapsto u\circ v of ϱ2(D)‾×Lc(E1;E2)\overline{\varrho_2(D)}\times \mathscr{L}_c(E_1; E_2) into Lc(E1;E2)\mathscr{L}_c(E_1; E_2) is continuous by prop. 9 of EVT, III, p. 33 and prop. 4 of EVT, III, p. 31. Hence the filter base ϱ(F1×F3)(F2)\varrho (\mathfrak{F}_1\times \mathfrak{F}_3)(\mathfrak{F}_2) converges to 0 in Lc(E1;E2)\mathscr{L}_c(E_1; E_2). This implies the assertion.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.