Proposition 3
Tag 03AG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03AG].
Théories spectrales, chapter V, § 2. Représentations des groupes localement compacts
a) Let be a sequence in such that the series
converges. Then the series with general term is absolutely convergent for outside a set T which is negligible modulo H. Let be the function on G with values in E which is equal to the sum of this series on G - T and equal to 0 on T. Then one has and the series with general term converges to in the space ;
b) Let be a sequence converging in to a function . There exists a subsequence extracted from such that converges to for every outside a set negligible modulo H;
c) The semi-normed spaces and are complete.
In assertion a), to say that the series with general term converges to in the space means that the sequence of partial sums converges to in . One then also says that is a sum of this series.
Let us prove a). By prop. 6 of INT, IV, p. 128, § 3, n, there exists a -negligible set such that the series with general term converges absolutely for . Moreover, the function which is equal to the sum of this series for and which is zero for satisfies .
The set is negligible modulo H. For every , the series with general term is absolutely convergent in E. Define for and otherwise. We have . Note that for every , whence . Thus . Similarly, we obtain
for every , hence the series converges to in . Assertion a) is proved.
Let us prove b). The sequence converges to 0 in the space . By INT, IV, p. 131, § 4, n, th. 3, there exists a subsequence which converges -almost everywhere to 0. The sequence then converges to for every outside a set negligible modulo H.
Finally, let us prove c). Let be a Cauchy sequence in . There exists a strictly increasing sequence of integers such that for every . For every , put = . By a), the series with general term converges in ; let denote its sum. For every , we obtain
hence is a cluster value of the sequence . It therefore converges (TG, II, p. 14, cor. 2 of prop. 5). Thus the space is complete; since the space is closed in (G), it is likewise complete.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.