Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 03HI, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03HI].

Theory of Sets, chapter II, § 3. Correspondences

Let G be a graph. There exists exactly one set A and exactly one set B with the following properties :

(1) the relation (∃y)((x, y)∈G)(\exists y)((x,\ y) \in \mathrm{G}) is equivalent to x∈Ax \in \mathrm{A};

(2) the relation (∃x)((x, y)∈G)(\exists x)((x,\ y) \in \mathrm{G}) is equivalent to y∈By \in \mathrm{B}.

For it is sufficient to take A (resp. B) to be the set of all objects of the form pr1z\mathrm{pr}_1 z (resp. pr2z\mathrm{pr}_2 z), where z∈Gz \in \mathrm{G} (§ 1, no. 6). Precisely,

A=Ex((∃y)((x,y)∈G)))andB=Ey((∃x)((x, y)∈G));\mathrm{A} = \mathscr{E}_x((\exists y)((x, y) \in \mathrm{G}))) \qquad \text{and} \qquad \mathrm{B} = \mathscr{E}_y((\exists x)((x,\ y) \in \mathrm{G}));

these sets are called respectively the first and second projections of the graph G, or the domain and range of G; they are denoted by pr1⟨G⟩\mathrm{pr}_1 \langle \mathrm{G} \rangle and pr2⟨G⟩\mathrm{pr}_2 \langle \mathrm{G} \rangle (or by pr1G\mathrm{pr}_1 \mathrm{G} and pr2G\mathrm{pr}_2 \mathrm{G} if there is no risk of confusion). It is immediately verified that G⊂(pr1G)×(pr2G)\mathrm{G} \subset (\mathrm{pr}_1 \mathrm{G}) \times (\mathrm{pr}_2 \mathrm{G}); every set of ordered pairs is therefore a subset of a product, and conversely. If one of the two sets pr1G\mathrm{pr}_1 \mathrm{G}, pr2G\mathrm{pr}_2 \mathrm{G} is empty, we have G=∅\mathrm{G} = \emptyset (§ 2, Proposition 2).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.