Lemma 4
Tag 03K7, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03K7].
Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 2. Well-ordered sets
Let E, F be two well-ordered sets and let f, g be two increasing mappings of E into F such that is a segment of F and g is strictly increasing; then for all .
Suppose, on the contrary, that the set of elements such that is not empty; then this set will have a least element . If , we have then since is strictly increasing. Since is a segment of F, there exists such that ; is increasing, so that implies . Hence
which is absurd.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
Nothing.