Bourbaki

Definition 2

Tag 03MX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03MX].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 6. Infinite sets

A sequence (resp. a sequence of elements of a set E) is a family (resp. a family of elements of E) whose index set is a subset of N\mathbf{N}. The sequence is said to be infinite if its index set is an infinite subset of N\mathbf{N}.

Let P{n}\mathrm{P}\{n\} be a relation and let I denote the set of integers nn such that P{n}\mathrm{P}\{n\} is true. I is then a subset of N\mathbf{N}. A sequence (xn)n∈I(x_n)_{n\in\mathrm{I}} is then sometimes written (xn)P{n}(x_n)_{\mathrm{P}\{n\}}, and xnx_n is called the nth term in the sequence. A sequence whose index set is the set of integers n⩾kn \geqslant k is often written (xn)k⩽n(x_n)_{k \leqslant n} or (xn)n⩾k(x_n)_{n \geqslant k}, or even just (xn)(x_n) if k=0k = 0 or k=1k = 1. Under the same conditions, for example, the notations ∏P{n}Xn\prod_{\mathrm{P}\{n\}} \mathrm{X}_n and ∏n=k∞Xn\prod_{n=k}^{\infty} \mathrm{X}_n are used to denote the product of a sequence of sets (Xn)n∈I(\mathrm{X}_n)_{n\in\mathrm{I}}, and there are analogous notations for unions, intersections, cardinal products, and cardinal sums.

Every subfamily of a sequence is a sequence, called a subsequence of the given sequence.

Two sequences (xn)n∈I(x_n)_{n\in\mathrm{I}}, (yn)n∈I(y_n)_{n\in\mathrm{I}} with the same index set are said to differ only in the order of their terms if there exists a permutation ff of the index set I such that xf(n)=ynx_{f(n)} = y_n for all n∈In \in \mathrm{I}.

A multiple sequence is a family whose index set is a subset of a product Np\mathbf{N}^p (pp an integer) ("double sequence" for p=2p = 2, "triple sequence" for p=3p = 3, and so on).

Let I be a set equipotent to N\mathbf{N} and let ff be a bijection of N\mathbf{N} onto I. For each family (xι)ι∈I(x_\iota)_{\iota\in\mathrm{I}} indexed by the set I, the sequence n→xf(n)n \to x_{f(n)} is said to be obtained by arranging the family (xι)ι∈I(x_\iota)_{\iota\in\mathrm{I}} in the order defined by ff. The sequences which correspond in this way to two distinct bijections of N\mathbf{N} onto I differ only in the order of their terms. For a finite family indexed by a set I of nn elements we may similarly define a finite sequence with [1,n][1, n] or [0,n−1][0, n-1] as index set, by arranging the family in the order defined by a bijection of one or the other of these intervals onto I.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.