Bourbaki

Exercise 21, § 6

Tag 03O1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03O1].

Theory of Sets, III, 246

Bourbaki marks this one as harder than the rest.

An infinite cardinal α\alpha is said to be dominant if, for each pair of cardinals m<αm<\alpha, n<αn<\alpha, we have mn<αm^n<\alpha.

(a) For α\alpha to be dominant it is sufficient that 2m<α2^m<\alpha for every cardinal m<αm<\alpha.

(b) Define inductively a sequence (an)(a_n) of cardinals as follows: a0=ℵ0a_0=\aleph_0, an+1=2ana_{n+1}=2^{a_n}. Show that the sum δ\delta of the sequence (an)(a_n) is a dominant cardinal. ℵ0\aleph_0 and δ\delta are the two smallest dominant cardinals.

(c) Show that δℵ0=ℵ0δ=2δ\delta\aleph_0=\aleph_0^\delta=2^\delta (note that 2δ≤δℵ02^\delta\leq\delta\aleph_0). Deduce that δℵ0=(2ℵ0)δ\delta^{\aleph_0}=(2^{\aleph_0})^\delta, although δ<2δ\delta<2^{\delta} and ℵ0<δ\aleph_0<\delta.

Solution

No solution has been written yet.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.