Bourbaki

Corollary 2

Tag 03OH, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03OH].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 7. Inverse limits and direct limits

Let (Eαλ,fαβλ)λ∈L(\mathrm{E}^\lambda_\alpha, f^\lambda_{\alpha\beta})_{\lambda \in \mathrm{L}} be a family of inverse systems of sets relative to I. If ∏λ∈Lfαβλ\prod_{\lambda \in \mathrm{L}} f^\lambda_{\alpha\beta} denotes the extension to products (Chapter II, § 5, no. 7, Definition 2) of the family of mappings (fαβλ)λ∈L(f^\lambda_{\alpha\beta})_{\lambda \in \mathrm{L}}, then (∏λ∈LEαλ,∏λ∈Lfαβλ)\left( \prod_{\lambda \in \mathrm{L}} \mathrm{E}^\lambda_\alpha, \prod_{\lambda \in \mathrm{L}} f^\lambda_{\alpha\beta} \right) is an inverse system of sets relative to I, and (up to a canonical bijection) we have

(18)lim←⁡α∏λ∈LEαλ=∏λ∈L(lim←⁡αEαλ).(18) \qquad \varprojlim_\alpha \prod_{\lambda \in \mathrm{L}} \mathrm{E}^\lambda_\alpha = \prod_{\lambda \in \mathrm{L}} (\varprojlim_\alpha \mathrm{E}^\lambda_\alpha).

Consider the double inverse system (Eαλ,gαβλμ)(\mathrm{E}^\lambda_\alpha, g^{\lambda\mu}_{\alpha\beta}) relative to I×L\mathrm{I} \times \mathrm{L}, where the order relation on L is equality (no. 1, Example 1), and apply Proposition 4.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.