Theorem 1
Tag 03P3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03P3].
Theory of Sets, chapter I, § 5. Equalitarian theories
.
Let denote the relation in . By C27 (§4, no. 1), for every relation in , is a theorem in , and therefore, by S7, , that is to say , is a theorem in . Taking to be the relation "not " and considering C26 (§4, no. 1), we see that is a theorem in . By C30 (§4, no. 3), is therefore a theorem in .
The relation is also a theorem in ; and if is a term in , then is a theorem in (cf. §4, no. 3). It is possible to transform later theorems in the same way into theorems in which no letter appears or into metamathematical criteria. From now on we shall not explicitly perform these transformations, but we shall often implicitly make use of them.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.